Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree

Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-29T23:21:18Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1004 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:42:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-ptp.c
>
> between commit:
>
> fbd47be098b5 ("amd-xgbe: add hardware PTP timestamping support")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> e78f70bad29c ("time/timecounter: Fix the lie that struct cyclecounter is const")
>
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the function updated by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the net-next tree and Linus' tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]