From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261153AbULMVV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:21:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261162AbULMVV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:21:26 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202]:23002 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261153AbULMVVO (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:21:14 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=J4+s+ZV1xmbYc5RtPn1dixHgJUOI8l9QiKg+3WP0Z/8x9Y/nXO51mEzQJHY1d8BoAhF1z/43Y/LYdvRLl684AmrzpHgma3yyFFcbHbtqBreY6E7mowmtIZK1JwiTLelwpC5jNO4a2Az7HsrFWW6zBVZXf5PbuQyOxdlHCvoblmU= Message-ID: <58cb370e0412131321694a6516@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 22:21:13 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: CD-ROM ide-dma blacklist amnesty drive Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander E. Patrakov" In-Reply-To: <7v7jns2tu3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7v7jns2tu3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:33:56 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > >The "SAMSUNG CD-ROM SC-148F" drive is listed in drive_blacklist in > >ide-dma.c. However, this drive worked well with DMA enabled with earlier > >kernel versions (<=2.6.8.1) where the "via82cxxx" driver did not look at > >this blacklist. So the question: what was the reason for blacklisting this > >(apparently working) drive? Is it still valid? > > This was discussed about two months ago without a firm > resolution as far as I can tell, in this thread: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/241862 > > Especially from Jens and Alan: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/242226 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/242228 > > I've been meaning to start a "CD-ROM ide-dma blacklist amnesty > drive" ;-) The intent is to gather comments from owners of > blacklisted drives to see if those models still deserve to be on > the blacklist. > > As for myself, I would vote for removing "PLEXTOR CD-R > PX-W8432T" (at least firmware "1.09") from the list. This model > seems to work fine with DMA. As Alexander does, I have been > running it on VIA motherboard which only recently started > looking at the ide-dma blacklist without trouble; that is, > before via82cxxx started caring. Plextor drive removed from the blacklist, thanks