From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Paul <set@pobox.com>, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Repeatable IDE Oops for 2.6.11 (ide-scsi vs ide-cdrom)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:23:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e050321002313213dbd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050318182754.GC7974@squish.home.loc>
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:27:54 -0500, Paul <set@pobox.com> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>, on Fri Mar 18, 2005 [05:34:06 PM] said:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:55:08 -0500, Paul <set@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > Hi;
> > >
> > > Here is what I did:
> > >
> > > # modprobe ide-scsi
> > > # cd /proc/ide/hdd (this is a dvdrw drive)
> > > # cat driver
> > > > ide-cdrom version 4.61
> > > # echo ide-scsi > driver
> > > # cat driver
> > > > ide-scsi (something--- didnt note exactly, except it was ide-scsi)
> > > # echo ide-cdrom > driver
> > >
> > > The shell is killed and Oops.
> > >
> > > Machine flakey and half alive at this point. Reboot with Alt-sysrq.
> > > The same thing works with 2.6.10, without Oops.
> >
> > Please see http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/11/132
>
> Hi;
>
> What is the nature of the 'ide-dev-2.6 tree'? Are there broken
> out patches available I can test vs. 2.6.11 or -mm? How do the 'ide fixes'
it is BK tree which is pulled into -mm, no patches against vanilla kernels (yet)
> in -ac intersect with ide-dev? I am also curious if these patches could
locking 'ide fixes' in -ac are another approach to the same problem
> have any effect on the pktcdvd problems I have reported.[*]
This issue looks like pktcdvdv/udf specific thing so these patches won't help.
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Paul
> set@pobox.com
>
> * http://lists.suse.com/archive/packet-writing/2005-Mar/0001.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-21 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-14 6:55 Repeatable IDE Oops for 2.6.11 (ide-scsi vs ide-cdrom) Paul
2005-03-14 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-15 8:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-15 13:22 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-15 13:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-18 16:34 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-18 18:27 ` Paul
2005-03-21 8:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58cb370e050321002313213dbd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=set@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox