From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261225AbVGDPnN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:43:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261230AbVGDPnN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:43:13 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.199]:27121 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261225AbVGDPlh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 11:41:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NVj4AIsv5WfROYUYBUoDOn2osHb0Bq74LISwuUR7IkkVAM068D0q3Bn/lo0qnvI4LUij/WqO2jNW0z8H8yXnOsjwUHrYZK1SXjse/fS4d9G2LwskhLgrkOQxTOMDLiayRTf0T49r2FkO9hZf0aYZbuVbgVvU7n/EQ/mhBc0DBYA= Message-ID: <58cb370e05070408417dc3c067@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:41:34 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Al Boldi Subject: Re: [git patches] IDE update Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200507041530.SAA02324@raad.intranet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <58cb370e05070405302d47fdfd@mail.gmail.com> <200507041530.SAA02324@raad.intranet> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/4/05, Al Boldi wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: { > What is the "int/dma problem"? > } > > Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31 > Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle > > Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12 > Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT > > It feels like DMA is not being applied properly in 2.6.12. > > Your comments please. Are earlier 2.6.x kernels okay? dmesg output? Bartlomiej