From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [another PATCH] Fix crash on boot in kmalloc_node IDE changes
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58cb370e05070709461d9a6d9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0507070930220.5875@graphe.net>
On 7/7/05, Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:21:55AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Without this patch a dual Xeon EM64T machine would oops on boot
> > > > because the hwif pointer here was NULL. I also added a check for
> > > > pci_dev because it's doubtful that all IDE devices have pci_devs.
> > >
> > > Here is IMHO the right way to fix this. Test for the hwif != NULL and
> > > test for pci_dev != NULL before determining the node number of the pci
> > > bus that the device is connected to. Maybe we need a hwif_to_node for ide
> > > drivers that is also able to determine the locality of other hardware?
> >
> > Hmm? Where is the difference?
>
> node = -1 if the node cannot be determined.
>
> > This is 100% equivalent to my code except that you compressed
> > it all into a single expression.
>
> My patch consistently checks for hwif != NULL and pci_dev != NULL.
> There was someother stuff in your patch. This patch does not add any
> additional variables and is more readable.
seconded but hwif != NULL still just hides some other issue
* hwifs and drives are not allocated dynamically
* drive->hwif is initialized to hwif for every hwif very early in the
driver initialization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-07 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-06 13:30 [PATCH] Fix crash on boot in kmalloc_node IDE changes Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 14:05 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-07-06 14:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 14:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-07-06 18:21 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-06 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-06 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 16:21 ` [another PATCH] " Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 16:24 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-07 16:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 16:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-07 17:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 16:46 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2005-07-07 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-07 16:40 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-07 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 17:31 ` Jens Axboe
2005-07-07 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-07-07 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-07 21:15 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-07 21:19 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-07-07 21:25 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-08 4:44 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58cb370e05070709461d9a6d9c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox