From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932540AbVHNPBH (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:01:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932541AbVHNPBH (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:01:07 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.192]:20678 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932540AbVHNPBG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:01:06 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fCsysKi6RfZ188CJqXBnNVcBNBcry1TmeMPRs4W3wlpyRpHrQ0+1N/DDe+pDDlQ9Ii5YEgQdVI37ffJhI1K/W01FDBUxpOTkMPcYK6dXSdkT1mHFGQUrK4X/DhYBGTB8mtJS6+aNvAgaRjktz9AgED040NYledkW/YxwvwitzsM= Message-ID: <58cb370e050814080120291979@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:01:04 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: IT8212/ITE RAID Cc: Daniel Drake , CaT , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1124026385.14138.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050814053017.GA27824@zip.com.au> <42FF263A.8080009@gentoo.org> <20050814114733.GB27824@zip.com.au> <42FF3CBA.1030900@gentoo.org> <1124026385.14138.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/14/05, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sul, 2005-08-14 at 13:44 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > [227523.229557] hda: 390721968 sectors (200049 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24321/255/63, BUG > > Thats probably the fact other patches from -ac are missing in base. It > should be harmless. Therefore please submit them. > > > [227523.229631] hda: cache flushes not supported > > > [227523.229932] hda:hda: recal_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } > > > [227523.230905] hda: recal_intr: error=0x04 { DriveStatusError } > > > [227523.230952] ide: failed opcode was: unknown > > Yep - on my "wtf" list. In some cases we send a strange command to the > IT8212 drive. I'm still trying to find the guilty command we send (none > of my drives do this), so that I can fix the ident adjustment to stop > it. The noise is just the command being rejected which is ok but messy > and wants stomping. small hint: WIN_RESTORE