From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932437AbVHPUmO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932704AbVHPUmO (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:14 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.192]:32989 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932441AbVHPUmL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:42:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FRljgkxMzIFgzXOuT0pDF8g7DHLNW9vvjK8h9NGv8eW7urFoZJbBe4XtY0w7lJH0lI3VONBHwl53/zs5QTPqtASkdx4fNihp9/LjYuOfy2kdSxF4niRXPuuhptwWV1NIvcKsmnMgLrT37hV27GXpMHnBPrtbYc2mDuKDQsxh0Uw= Message-ID: <58cb370e050816134270b445ea@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:42:07 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE: don't offer IDE_GENERIC on ia64 Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1124223946.22924.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200508111424.43150.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <200508151507.22776.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <58cb370e050816023845b57a74@mail.gmail.com> <200508161316.32602.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <1124223946.22924.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/16/05, Alan Cox wrote: > > > * non-functional HDIO_REGISTER_HWIF ioctl (ain't really working either) > > > > HDIO_SCAN_HWIF - I don't know about this one. How are we supposed to > > follow the "new ports shouldn't define IDE_ARCH_OBSOLETE_INIT" injunction > > if we lose all this functionality without it? ia64 is about as close to > > a new port as you get :-) > > It allows you to register interfaces from user space. > > As to IDE_ARCH_OBOSOLETE_INIT, its a red herring. It's not worth the > trouble to avoid it given the expected short remaining life time of the > old IDE layer. Far better would be to help get the new SATA layer doing > PATA so drivers/ide can be deleted. My opinion on this matter differ, I want to: * finish rewriting IDE code * deprecate crap * (later) drop crap and merge rest with libata I will write precised TODO (w/ status) soon. IMO this is much better solution as: * you go from working code into small steps (evolution) * you don't have to maintain both libata and IDE driver for X years (deleting drivers/ide anytime soon is a pipedream) * as IDE becomes less popular testing gets harder (especially when developing new code - you don't have previous state) * it shouldn't be that hard - I have many parts of the stuff done (they need some polishing) Bjorn, thanks for working on this, IDE_ARCH_OBSOLETE_INIT ( -> ide_init_hwif_ports() ) needs to be fixed in order to make REAL improvements. Bartlomiej