linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, paulmck@kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, seanjc@google.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	manali.shukla@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	xin3.li@intel.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com, xin@zytor.com,
	chang.seok.bae@intel.com, fenghuay@nvidia.com,
	peternewman@google.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 13/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_cfg to track assignable counters per domain
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 20:31:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58d214b6-9bd0-42dc-a00d-cc80bccc8fdd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <887bad33-7f4a-4b6d-95a7-fdfe0451f42b@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,

On 6/24/2025 6:31 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 6/13/25 2:04 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> The "mbm_event" mode allows users to assign a hardware counter ID to an
> 
> "hardware counter ID" -> "hardware counter" (I'll stop pointing these out)

Sure.

> 
>> RMID, event pair and monitor bandwidth usage as long as it is assigned.
>> The hardware continues to track the assigned counter until it is
>> explicitly unassigned by the user. Counters are assigned/unassigned at
>> monitoring domain level.
>>
>> Manage a monitoring domain's hardware counters using a per monitoring
>> domain array of struct mbm_cntr_cfg that is indexed by the hardware
>> counter ID. A hardware counter's configuration contains the MBM event
>> ID and points to the monitoring group that it is assigned to, with a
>> NULL pointer meaning that the hardware counter is available for assignment.
>>
>> There is no direct way to determine which hardware counters are assigned
>> to a particular monitoring group. Check every entry of every hardware
>> counter configuration array in every monitoring domain to query which
>> MBM events of a monitoring group is tracked by hardware. Such queries are
>> acceptable because of a very small number of assignable counters (32
>> to 64).
>>
>> Suggested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
> ...
> 
>> ---
>>   fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c   |  8 ++++++++
>>   include/linux/resctrl.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index 967e4df62a19..90b52593ef29 100644
>> --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -4084,6 +4084,7 @@ static void rdtgroup_setup_default(void)
>>   
>>   static void domain_destroy_mon_state(struct rdt_mon_domain *d)
>>   {
>> +	kfree(d->cntr_cfg);
>>   	bitmap_free(d->rmid_busy_llc);
>>   	for (int i = 0; i < QOS_NUM_L3_MBM_EVENTS; i++) {
>>   		kfree(d->mbm_states[i]);
>> @@ -4167,6 +4168,13 @@ static int domain_setup_mon_state(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain
>>   			goto cleanup;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (resctrl_is_mbm_enabled() && r->mon.mbm_cntr_assignable) {
>> +		tsize = sizeof(*d->cntr_cfg);
>> +		d->cntr_cfg = kcalloc(r->mon.num_mbm_cntrs, tsize, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!d->cntr_cfg)
>> +			goto cleanup;
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Please see my earlier comment https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b761e6ec-a874-4d06-8437-a3a717a91abb@intel.com/
> Before this addition the "cleanup" goto label can only be called when
> (a) idx is guaranteed to be initialized and (b) d->mbm_states[idx] == NULL.
> Using that goto label in snippet above cannot guarantee either.

Yes. Tony took care of this.

cleanup:
         bitmap_free(d->rmid_busy_llc);
         for_each_mbm_idx(idx) {
                 kfree(d->mbm_states[idx]);
                 d->mbm_states[idx] = NULL;
         }

         return -ENOMEM;
}

> 
>>   	return 0;
>>   cleanup:
>>   	bitmap_free(d->rmid_busy_llc);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/resctrl.h b/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> index f078ef24a8ad..468a4ebabc64 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
>> @@ -156,6 +156,22 @@ struct rdt_ctrl_domain {
>>   	u32				*mbps_val;
>>   };
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * struct mbm_cntr_cfg - Assignable counter configuration.
>> + * @evtid:		MBM event to which the counter is assigned. Only valid
>> + *			if @rdtgroup is not NULL.
>> + * @evt_cfg:		Event configuration created using the READS_TO_LOCAL_MEM,
>> + *			READS_TO_REMOTE_MEM, etc. bits that represent the memory
>> + *			transactions being counted.
>> + * @rdtgrp:		resctrl group assigned to the counter. NULL if the
>> + *			counter is free.
>> + */
>> +struct mbm_cntr_cfg {
>> +	enum resctrl_event_id	evtid;
>> +	u32			evt_cfg;
> 
> It is not clear to me why the event configuration needs to be duplicated
> between mbm_cntr_cfg::evt_cfg and mon_evt::evt_cfg (done in patch #16).
> I think there should be only one "source of truth" and mon_evt::evt_cfg
> seems most appropriate since then it can be shared with BMEC.
> 
> It also seems unnecessary to make so many copies of the event configuration
> if it can just be determined from the event ID.
> 
> Looking ahead at how this is used, for example in event_filter_write()
> introduced in patch #25:
> 	ret = resctrl_process_configs(buf, &evt_cfg);
> 	if (!ret && mevt->evt_cfg != evt_cfg) {
> 		mevt->evt_cfg = evt_cfg;
> 		resctrl_assign_cntr_allrdtgrp(r, mevt);
> 	}
> 
> After user provides new event configuration the mon_evt::evt_cfg is
> updated. Since there is this initial check to determine if counters need
> to be updated I think it is unnecessary to have a second copy of mbm_cntr_cfg::evt_cfg
> that needs to be checked again. The functions called by resctrl_assign_cntr_allrdtgrp(r, mevt)
> should just update the counters without any additional comparison.
> 
> For example, rdtgroup_assign_cntr() can be simplified to:
> 	rdtgroup_assign_cntr() {
> 		...
> 		list_for_each_entry(d, &r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
> 			cntr_id = mbm_cntr_get(r, d, rdtgrp, mevt->evtid);
> 			if (cntr_id >= 0)
> 				resctrl_arch_config_cntr(r, d, mevt->evtid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid,
> 							 rdtgrp->closid, cntr_id, true);
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> 

Actually, this interaction works as intended.

It serves as an optimization for cases where the user repeatedly tries 
to assign the same event to a group. Since we have no way of knowing 
whether the event is up-to-date, this mechanism helps us avoid 
unnecessary MSR writes.

For example:
mbm_L3_assignments_write() → resctrl_assign_cntr_event() → 
resctrl_alloc_config_cntr() → resctrl_config_cntr() → 
resctrl_arch_config_cntr()


resctrl_alloc_config_cntr()

{
..

/*
  * Skip reconfiguration if the event setup is current; otherwise,
  * update and apply the new configuration to the domain.
  */
  if (mevt->evt_cfg != d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evt_cfg) {
      d->cntr_cfg[cntr_id].evt_cfg = mevt->evt_cfg;
      resctrl_config_cntr(r, d, mevt->evtid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid,
                                 rdtgrp->closid, cntr_id, true);
    }
}


Thanks
Babu

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13 21:04 [PATCH v14 00/32] fs,x86/resctrl: Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 01/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Remove unappropriate references to cacheinfo in the resctrl subsystem Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 02/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitor event descriptions Babu Moger
2025-06-24 21:28   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 15:57     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-25 17:55       ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-25 20:12         ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-25 22:31           ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 03/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Replace architecture event enabled checks Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 04/32] x86/resctrl: Remove 'rdt_mon_features' global variable Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 05/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Prepare for more monitor events Babu Moger
2025-06-24 21:30   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 06/32] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2025-06-24 21:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 16:28     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 07/32] x86/resctrl: Add ABMC feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 08/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Consolidate monitoring related data from rdt_resource Babu Moger
2025-06-24 21:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 16:53     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 09/32] x86/resctrl: Detect Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring feature details Babu Moger
2025-06-24 21:33   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 17:58     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 10/32] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature Babu Moger
2025-06-24 22:37   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 19:50     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 11/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display monitoring modes Babu Moger
2025-06-24 22:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 20:14     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 12/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of assignable counter IDs Babu Moger
2025-06-24 23:05   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-25 20:33     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 13/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_cfg to track assignable counters per domain Babu Moger
2025-06-24 23:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26  1:31     ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2025-06-26 15:05       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 15:46         ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 14/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of free MBM counters Babu Moger
2025-06-24 23:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 14:17     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-24 23:41   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 14:19     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:04 ` [PATCH v14 15/32] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for ABMC assignment Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 16/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Introduce event configuration field in struct mon_evt Babu Moger
2025-06-24 23:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 16:47     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 17/32] x86/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_config_cntr() to assign a counter with ABMC Babu Moger
2025-06-25  3:03   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 17:41     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-26 18:02       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 18:35         ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-26 20:24           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 18/32] fs/resctrl: Add the functionality to assign MBM events Babu Moger
2025-06-25  3:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 19:31     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 19/32] fs/resctrl: Add the functionality to unassign " Babu Moger
2025-06-25  3:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-26 21:12     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 20/32] fs/resctrl: Report 'Unassigned' for MBM events in mbm_event mode Babu Moger
2025-06-25  4:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-27  1:34     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 21/32] fs/resctrl: Pass entire struct rdtgroup rather than passing individual members Babu Moger
2025-06-25  4:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 13:57     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-30 15:44       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 20:58         ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-30 21:59           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 22:47             ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 22/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add the support for reading ABMC counters Babu Moger
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 23/32] fs/resctrl: Add definitions for MBM event configuration Babu Moger
2025-06-25  4:32   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 17:20     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-30 21:58       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 22:51         ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 24/32] fs/resctrl: Add event configuration directory under info/L3_MON/ Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-30 19:06     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 25/32] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to update the event configurations Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-01  0:43     ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-01  1:33       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-01 16:14         ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 26/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_assign_on_mkdir to enable assignments on mkdir Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-01 16:23     ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-01 16:37       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 27/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters " Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:25   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-01 19:06     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 28/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce mbm_L3_assignments to list assignments in a group Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:27   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-01 19:48     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 29/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to modify " Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-02  2:18     ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-02  2:56       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 30/32] fs/resctrl: Hide the BMEC related files when mbm_event mode is enabled Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-02 16:42     ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-02 17:21       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-02 19:04         ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-03 16:21           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-07 22:35             ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 13:27               ` Moger, Babu
2025-07-08 15:21                 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-08 15:43                   ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 31/32] fs/resctrl: Introduce the interface to switch between monitor modes Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-02 17:39     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:05 ` [PATCH v14 32/32] x86/resctrl: Configure mbm_event mode if supported Babu Moger
2025-06-25 23:40   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-02 17:45     ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-13 21:41 ` [PATCH v14 00/32] fs,x86/resctrl: Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Luck, Tony
2025-06-16 14:47   ` Moger, Babu
2025-06-24 21:25 ` Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58d214b6-9bd0-42dc-a00d-cc80bccc8fdd@amd.com \
    --to=bmoger@amd.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=manali.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).