From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Lukasz Luba" <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Søren Andersen" <san@skov.dk>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:22:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58e19481-530c-4465-aec5-1f44462eaf5f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250314113604.1776201-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hi deee Ho Oleksij,
On 14/03/2025 13:36, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This commit introduces the Power State Change Reasons Recording (PSCRR)
> framework into the kernel. The framework is vital for systems where
> PMICs or watchdogs cannot provide information on power state changes. It
> stores reasons for system shutdowns and reboots, like under-voltage or
> software-triggered events, in non-volatile hardware storage. This
> approach is essential for postmortem analysis in scenarios where
> traditional storage methods (block devices, RAM) are not feasible. The
> framework aids bootloaders and early-stage system components in recovery
> decision-making, although it does not cover resets caused by hardware
> issues like system freezes or watchdog timeouts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
I see you're already at v6, so I am probably slightly late... I think I
hadn't noticed this before. Thus, feel free to treat my comments as mere
suggestions.
All in all, I do like this series. Looks mostly very good to me :) Just
wondering if we could utilize this same for standardizing reading the
reset reason registers which are included in many PMICs?
> ---
...
> +int pscrr_core_init(const struct pscrr_backend_ops *ops)
> +{
> + enum psc_reason stored_val = PSCR_UNKNOWN;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pscrr_lock);
> +
> + if (g_pscrr) {
> + pr_err("PSCRR: Core is already initialized!\n");
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ops->read_reason || !ops->write_reason) {
> + pr_err("PSCRR: Backend must provide read and write callbacks\n");
Why both are required?
I can easily envision integrating the some PMIC's 'boot reason' register
reading to the PSCRR. Benefit would be that user-space could use this
same interface when reading the reset reason on a system where reason is
stored using mechanisms provided by this series - and when reset reason
is automatically stored by the HW (for example to a PMIC).
In a PMIC case the write_reason might not be needed, right?
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + g_pscrr = kzalloc(sizeof(*g_pscrr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!g_pscrr) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + g_pscrr->ops = ops;
> + g_pscrr->last_boot_reason = PSCR_UNKNOWN;
> +
> + ret = ops->read_reason(&stored_val);
> + if (!ret) {
> + g_pscrr->last_boot_reason = stored_val;
> + pr_info("PSCRR: Initial read_reason: %d (%s)\n",
> + stored_val, psc_reason_to_str(stored_val));
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("PSCRR: read_reason failed, err=%pe\n",
> + ERR_PTR(ret));
> + }
...
> +/**
> + * struct pscrr_backend_ops - Backend operations for storing power state change
> + * reasons.
> + *
> + * This structure defines the interface for backend implementations that handle
> + * the persistent storage of power state change reasons. Different backends
> + * (e.g., NVMEM, EEPROM, battery-backed RAM) can implement these operations to
> + * store and retrieve shutdown reasons across reboots.
Maybe we should support / mention also a case where the PMIC driver
could just register the read-callback and provide the reset reason
stored by the PMIC to users. In this case the write_reason might not be
needed.
> + *
> + * @write_reason: Function pointer to store the specified `psc_reason` in
> + * persistent storage. This function is called before a reboot
> + * to record the last power state change reason.
> + * @read_reason: Function pointer to retrieve the last stored `psc_reason`
> + * from persistent storage. This function is called at boot to
> + * restore the shutdown reason.
> + */
> +struct pscrr_backend_ops {
> + int (*write_reason)(enum psc_reason reason);
> + int (*read_reason)(enum psc_reason *reason);
> +};
Yours,
-- Matti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 11:35 [PATCH v6 0/7] Introduction of PSCR Framework and Related Components Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] power: Extend power_on_reason.h for upcoming PSCRR framework Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] reboot: hw_protection_trigger: use standardized numeric shutdown/reboot reasons instead of strings Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:36 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] power: reset: Introduce PSCR Recording Framework for Non-Volatile Storage Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 12:22 ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2025-03-14 13:58 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-17 7:55 ` Matti Vaittinen
2025-03-14 11:36 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] nvmem: provide consumer access to cell size metrics Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:36 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] nvmem: add support for device and sysfs-based cell lookups Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:36 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] power: reset: add PSCR NVMEM Driver for Recording Power State Change Reasons Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 11:36 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] Documentation: Add sysfs documentation for PSCRR reboot reason tracking Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-14 13:38 ` Matti Vaittinen
2025-03-14 14:10 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-03-17 8:46 ` Matti Vaittinen
2025-03-18 9:22 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58e19481-530c-4465-aec5-1f44462eaf5f@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=san@skov.dk \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox