From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Unexpected OOM instead of reclaiming inactive file pages
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:48:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5905724.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
Hello Damien.
I'm fairly confident that the following commit
459779d04ae8d block: Improve read ahead size for rotational devices
caused a regression in my test bench.
I'm running v6.17-rc1 in a small QEMU VM with virtio-scsi disk. It has got 1 GiB of RAM, so I can saturate it easily causing reclaiming mechanism to kick in.
If MGLRU is enabled:
$ echo 1000 | sudo tee /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms
then, once page cache builds up, an OOM happens without reclaiming inactive file pages: [1]. Note that inactive_file:506952kB, I'd expect these to be reclaimed instead, like how it happens with v6.16.
If MGLRU is disabled:
$ echo 0 | sudo tee /sys/kernel/mm/lru_gen/min_ttl_ms
then OOM doesn't occur, and things seem to work as usual.
If MGLRU is enabled, and 459779d04ae8d is reverted on top of v6.17-rc1, the OOM doesn't happen either.
Could you please check this?
Thank you.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE
[1]: https://paste.voidband.net/TG5OiZ29.log
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 15:48 Oleksandr Natalenko [this message]
2025-08-11 16:06 ` [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Unexpected OOM instead of reclaiming inactive file pages David Rientjes
2025-08-11 20:42 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2025-08-12 0:45 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-12 7:37 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5905724.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name \
--to=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).