From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86_64/kexec: Use PUD level 1GB page for identity mapping if available
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 15:32:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <590C2A96.3090106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170505065253.s5yv7c2cxgfcf4i3@gmail.com>
On 05/05/2017 at 02:52 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ static int init_pgtable(struct kimage *image, unsigned long start_pgtable)
>>
>> level4p = (pgd_t *)__va(start_pgtable);
>> clear_page(level4p);
>> +
>> + if (direct_gbpages)
>> + info.direct_gbpages = true;
> No, this should be keyed off the CPU feature (X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES) automatically,
> not set blindly! AFAICS this patch will crash kexec on any CPU that does not
> support gbpages.
It should be fine, probe_page_size_mask() already takes care of this:
if (direct_gbpages && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "Using GB pages for direct mapping\n");
page_size_mask |= 1 << PG_LEVEL_1G;
} else {
direct_gbpages = 0;
}
So if X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES is not supported, direct_gbpages will be set to 0.
>
> I only noticed this problem after having fixed/enhanced all the changelogs - so
> please pick up the new changelog up from the log below.
Thanks for the rewrite, it looks better.
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>
> ============================>
>
> Author: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
>
> x86/mm: Add support for gbpages to kernel_ident_mapping_init()
>
> Kernel identity mappings on x86-64 kernels are created in two
> ways: by the early x86 boot code, or by kernel_ident_mapping_init().
>
> Native kernels (which is the dominant usecase) use the former,
> but the kexec and the hibernation code uses kernel_ident_mapping_init().
>
> There's a subtle difference between these two ways of how identity
> mappings are created, the current kernel_ident_mapping_init() code
> creates identity mappings always using 2MB page(PMD level) - while
> the native kernel boot path also utilizes gbpages where available.
>
> This difference is suboptimal both for performance and for memory
> usage: kernel_ident_mapping_init() needs to allocate pages for the
> page tables when creating the new identity mappings.
>
> This patch adds 1GB page(PUD level) support to kernel_ident_mapping_init()
> to address these concerns.
>
> The primary advantage would be better TLB coverage/performance,
> because we'd utilize 1GB TLBs instead of 2MB ones.
>
> It is also useful for machines with large number of memory to
> save paging structure allocations(around 4MB/TB using 2MB page)
> when setting identity mappings for all the memory, after using
> 1GB page it will consume only 8KB/TB.
>
> ( Note that this change alone does not activate gbpages in kexec,
> we are doing that in a separate patch. )
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-04 1:42 [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm/ident_map: Add PUD level 1GB page support Xunlei Pang
2017-05-04 1:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86_64/kexec: Use PUD level 1GB page for identity mapping if available Xunlei Pang
2017-05-05 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-05 7:32 ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2017-05-05 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-05 10:50 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-05-08 6:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-05-08 7:24 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-05-08 8:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/kexec/64: Use gbpages for identity mappings " tip-bot for Xunlei Pang
2017-05-08 8:01 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Add support for gbpages to kernel_ident_mapping_init() tip-bot for Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=590C2A96.3090106@redhat.com \
--to=xpang@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox