public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>,
	linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] metag: tz1090: add TZ1090 clocks to device tree
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:03:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5932816.ccTTaBqqIv@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141121100647.GF12456@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org>

Am Freitag, 21. November 2014, 10:06:47 schrieb James Hogan:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:56:24PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > I don't know enough about your clock structure, but it looks quite a bit
> > like Mike's mail from May [0] may apply here too.
> > 
> > The register layout also suggests that it is indeed one clock ip-block:
> > 
> > 0x02005908 0x4	CR_TOP_CLKSWITCH
> > 0x0200590c 0x4	CR_TOP_CLKENAB
> > 0x02005950 0x4	CR_TOP_SYSPLL_CTL0
> > 0x02005954 0x4	CR_TOP_SYSPLL_CTL1
> > 0x02005988 0x4	CR_TOP_CLKSWITCH2
> > 0x0200598c 0x4	CR_TOP_CLKENAB2
> > ...
> > 
> > 
> > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/14/715
> 
> Thanks, that does make sense. It's probably more like 4 memory regions
> ("top" level, "perip" peripheral registers, "hep" high end peripheral
> registers, and "pdc" powerdown controller registers), but it could
> certainly still have a single binding with multiple memory regions to
> simplify the clock specifiers.

It could also make sense to have 4 clock controller nodes for those. I guess 
it all depends on how the hardware is layed out.

For example on Rockchip SoCs, all of this is contained in the "APB CRU" (Clock 
and Reset Unit) with a memory region of <0x20000000 0x4000> - so here one 
hardware-block that contains all the clocks and also the reset controller.

On the other hand it might very well be more than one ip-block on your 
platform. 

So I guess it comes down to looking at the memory map [or documentation :-) ] 
to determine how many ip blocks there really are.


Heiko

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-19 23:15 [PATCH 00/15] tz1090: add clock components James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 01/15] clk: divider: replace bitfield width with mask James Hogan
2014-11-20 11:19   ` Tero Kristo
2014-11-20 11:59     ` James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 02/15] clk: divider: expose new clk_register_divider_mask James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 03/15] dt: binding: add binding for tz1090-pll clock James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 04/15] clk: tz1090: add PLL clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 05/15] dt: binding: add binding for TZ1090 gate bank James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 06/15] clk: tz1090: add gate bank clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 07/15] dt: binding: add binding for TZ1090 mux bank James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 08/15] clk: tz1090: add mux bank clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 09/15] dt: binding: add binding for TZ1090 clock deleter James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 10/15] clk: tz1090: add deleter clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 11/15] dt: binding: add binding for TZ1090 PDC clock James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 12/15] clk: tz1090: add PDC clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 13/15] dt: binding: add binding for TZ1090 divider clock James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 14/15] clk: tz1090: add divider clock driver James Hogan
2014-11-19 23:15 ` [PATCH 15/15] metag: tz1090: add TZ1090 clocks to device tree James Hogan
2014-11-20 12:56   ` Heiko Stübner
2014-11-21 10:06     ` James Hogan
2014-11-24 23:03       ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-11-25 11:39         ` James Hogan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5932816.ccTTaBqqIv@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-metag@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox