From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: manish.rangankar@cavium.com, target-devel@vger.kernel.org,
nab@linux-iscsi.org, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, mst@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] uio: Fix uio_device memory leak
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:16:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5940804E.1060000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613140146.GA29175@kroah.com>
On 06/13/2017 09:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:06:44PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> It looks like there might be 2 issues with the uio_device allocation, or it
>> looks like we are leaking the device for possibly a specific type of device
>> case that I could not find but one of you may know about.
>>
>> Issues:
>> 1. We use devm_kzalloc to allocate the uio_device, but the release
>> function, devm_kmalloc_release, is just a noop, so the memory is never freed.
>
> What do you mean by this? If the release function is a noop, lots of
> memory in the kernel is leaking. UIO shouldn't have to do anything
> special here, is the devm api somehow broken?
Sorry. I misdiagnosed the problem. It's a noop, but we did kfree on the
entire devres and its data later.
The problem I was hitting is that memory is not freed until the parent
is removed. __uio_register_device does:
idev = devm_kzalloc(parent, sizeof(*idev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!idev) {
return -ENOMEM;
}
so the devres's memory is associated with the parent. Is that intentional?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-14 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 20:06 [PATCH 1/1] uio: Fix uio_device memory leak Mike Christie
2017-06-13 14:01 ` Greg KH
2017-06-14 0:16 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2017-06-14 0:35 ` Mike Christie
2017-06-14 5:03 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5940804E.1060000@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manish.rangankar@cavium.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox