public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix iolat timestamp and restore accounting semantics
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:48:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59500829-10f5-fa83-b2db-fcfa4a1cd11d@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211230114.65967-1-dennis@kernel.org>

On 12/11/18 4:01 PM, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> The blk-iolatency controller measures the time from rq_qos_throttle() to
> rq_qos_done_bio() and attributes this time to the first bio that needs
> to create the request. This means if a bio is plug-mergeable or
> bio-mergeable, it gets to bypass the blk-iolatency controller.
> 
> The recent series, to tag all bios w/ blkgs in [1] changed the timing
> incorrectly as well. First, the iolatency controller was tagging bios
> and using that information if it should process it in rq_qos_done_bio().
> However, now that all bios are tagged, this caused the atomic_t for the
> struct rq_wait inflight count to underflow resulting in a stall. Second,
> now the timing was using the duration a bio from generic_make_request()
> rather than the timing mentioned above.
> 
> This patch fixes these issues by reusing the BLK_QUEUE_ENTERED flag to
> determine if a bio has entered the request layer and is responsible for
> starting a request. Stacked drivers don't recurse through
> blk_mq_make_request(), so the overhead of using time between
> generic_make_request() and the blk_mq_get_request() should be minimal.
> blk-iolatency now checks if this flag is set to determine if it should
> process the bio in rq_qos_done_bio().

I'm having a hard time convincing myself that this is correct... Maybe
we should just add a new flag for this specific use case? Or feel free
to convince me otherwise.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-13 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11 23:01 [PATCH v2] block: fix iolat timestamp and restore accounting semantics Dennis Zhou
2018-12-13 19:48 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-12-13 19:52   ` Josef Bacik
2018-12-13 19:59     ` Jens Axboe
2018-12-13 20:03       ` Josef Bacik
2018-12-13 20:10         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59500829-10f5-fa83-b2db-fcfa4a1cd11d@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox