From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, briannorris@chromium.org,
dianders@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:57:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5950DA92.5050709@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706261011540.2425@nanos>
Hi Thomas,
thanx for your comments.
On 06/26/2017 04:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Jeffy,
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>> void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> - irq_state_clr_disabled(desc);
>> - if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable)
>> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable(&desc->irq_data);
>> - else
>> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data);
>> - irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
>> + if (irqd_is_started(&desc->irq_data) &&
>> + !irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data)) {
>> + unmask_irq(desc);
>
> I'm having a hard time to understand the logic here.
>
> if (started && !disabled)
> unmask()
>
> That does not make any sense. If you need that to work around a state
> inconsistency then it needs to be addressed there and not worked around
> here.
right, we already set disabled state in desc_set_defaults, so the
disabled state should be consistency here. so just
if(!disabled)
unmask()
else
enable()
?
and i saw we didn't set masked state in desc_set_defaults, i'll send a
patch for that, and remove unmask_irq's started check too.
>
>> + } else {
>> + irq_state_clr_disabled(desc);
>> + if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable) {
>> + desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable(&desc->irq_data);
>> + irq_state_clr_masked(desc);
>> + } else {
>> + unmask_irq(desc);
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void __irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, bool mask)
>> {
>> - irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
>> - if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) {
>> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
>> - irq_state_set_masked(desc);
>> - } else if (mask) {
>> - mask_irq(desc);
>> + if (irqd_irq_disabled(&desc->irq_data)) {
>> + if (mask)
>> + mask_irq(desc);
>> + } else {
>> + irq_state_set_disabled(desc);
>> + if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable) {
>> + desc->irq_data.chip->irq_disable(&desc->irq_data);
>> + irq_state_set_masked(desc);
>> + } else if (mask) {
>> + mask_irq(desc);
>> + }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -311,18 +322,21 @@ void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu)
>>
>> static inline void mask_ack_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> - if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask_ack)
>> + if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask_ack) {
>> desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask_ack(&desc->irq_data);
>> - else {
>> - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
>> + irq_state_set_masked(desc);
>> + } else {
>> + mask_irq(desc);
>> if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack)
>> desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data);
>> }
>> - irq_state_set_masked(desc);
>> }
>>
>> void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> + if (irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask) {
>> desc->irq_data.chip->irq_mask(&desc->irq_data);
>> irq_state_set_masked(desc);
>> @@ -331,6 +345,10 @@ void mask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>>
>> void unmask_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> {
>> + if (irqd_is_started(&desc->irq_data) &&
>> + !irqd_irq_masked(&desc->irq_data))
>> + return;
>
> Ditto.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-26 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-26 6:12 [RFC PATCH] genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls Jeffy Chen
2017-06-26 8:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-26 9:57 ` jeffy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5950DA92.5050709@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox