public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:50:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5953B436.6030506@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adc11342-737f-4e06-bce3-f0a92b5594a5@solarflare.com>

Hi Edward,

On 06/27/2017 02:53 PM, Edward Cree wrote:
> This series simplifies alignment tracking, generalises bounds tracking and
>   fixes some bounds-tracking bugs in the BPF verifier.  Pointer arithmetic on
>   packet pointers, stack pointers, map value pointers and context pointers has
>   been unified, and bounds on these pointers are only checked when the pointer
>   is dereferenced.
> Operations on pointers which destroy all relation to the original pointer
>   (such as multiplies and shifts) are disallowed if !env->allow_ptr_leaks,
>   otherwise they convert the pointer to an unknown scalar and feed it to the
>   normal scalar arithmetic handling.
> Pointer types have been unified with the corresponding adjusted-pointer types
>   where those existed (e.g. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE[_ADJ] or FRAME_PTR vs
>   PTR_TO_STACK); similarly, CONST_IMM and UNKNOWN_VALUE have been unified into
>   SCALAR_VALUE.
> Pointer types (except CONST_PTR_TO_MAP, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL and
>   PTR_TO_PACKET_END, which do not allow arithmetic) have a 'fixed offset' and
>   a 'variable offset'; the former is used when e.g. adding an immediate or a
>   known-constant register, as long as it does not overflow.  Otherwise the
>   latter is used, and any operation creating a new variable offset creates a
>   new 'id' (and, for PTR_TO_PACKET, clears the 'range').
> SCALAR_VALUEs use the 'variable offset' fields to track the range of possible
>   values; the 'fixed offset' should never be set on a scalar.
>
> As of patch 12/12, all tests of tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier
>   and tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align pass.
>
> v3: added a few more tests; removed RFC tags.

Did you also have a chance in the meantime to look at reducing complexity
along with your unification? I did run the cilium test suite with your
latest set from here and current # worst case processed insns that
verifier has to go through for cilium progs increases from ~53k we have
right now to ~76k. I'm a bit worried that this quickly gets us close to
the upper ~98k max limit starting to reject programs again. Alternative
is to bump the complexity limit again in near future once run into it,
but preferably there's a way to optimize it along with the rewrite? Do
you see any possibilities worth exploring?

> v2: fixed nfp build, made test_align pass again and extended it with a few
>   new tests (though still need to add more).
>
> Edward Cree (12):
>    selftests/bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks
>    bpf/verifier: rework value tracking
>    nfp: change bpf verifier hooks to match new verifier data structures
>    bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values
>    bpf/verifier: more concise register state logs for constant var_off
>    selftests/bpf: change test_verifier expectations
>    selftests/bpf: rewrite test_align
>    selftests/bpf: add a test to test_align
>    selftests/bpf: add test for bogus operations on pointers
>    selftests/bpf: don't try to access past MAX_PACKET_OFF in
>      test_verifier
>    selftests/bpf: add tests for subtraction & negative numbers
>    selftests/bpf: variable offset negative tests
>
>   drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c |   24 +-
>   include/linux/bpf.h                               |   34 +-
>   include/linux/bpf_verifier.h                      |   56 +-
>   include/linux/tnum.h                              |   81 +
>   kernel/bpf/Makefile                               |    2 +-
>   kernel/bpf/tnum.c                                 |  180 ++
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c                             | 1943 ++++++++++++---------
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c          |  462 ++++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c       |  293 ++--
>   9 files changed, 2034 insertions(+), 1041 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 include/linux/tnum.h
>   create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/tnum.c
>

Thanks,
Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-28 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-27 12:53 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/12] selftests/bpf: add test for mixed signed and unsigned bounds checks Edward Cree
2017-06-28 13:51   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-27 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/12] bpf/verifier: rework value tracking Edward Cree
2017-06-28 15:15   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-28 16:07     ` Edward Cree
2017-06-28 19:44       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-28 17:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-28 18:28     ` Edward Cree
2017-06-29  7:48   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-06 21:21   ` [iovisor-dev] " Nadav Amit
2017-07-07 13:48     ` Edward Cree
2017-07-07 17:45       ` Nadav Amit
2017-07-08  0:54         ` Nadav Amit
2017-07-12 19:13         ` Edward Cree
2017-07-12 22:07           ` Nadav Amit
2017-07-17 17:02             ` Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:57 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/12] nfp: change bpf verifier hooks to match new verifier data structures Edward Cree
2017-06-28 20:47   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-29  3:47   ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-06-27 12:57 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/12] bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/12] bpf/verifier: more concise register state logs for constant var_off Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: change test_verifier expectations Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: rewrite test_align Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: add a test to test_align Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: add test for bogus operations on pointers Edward Cree
2017-06-27 12:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: don't try to access past MAX_PACKET_OFF in test_verifier Edward Cree
2017-06-27 13:00 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/12] selftests/bpf: add tests for subtraction & negative numbers Edward Cree
2017-06-27 13:00 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: variable offset negative tests Edward Cree
2017-06-28 13:50 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-06-28 14:11   ` [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier Edward Cree
2017-06-28 20:38     ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-06-28 21:37       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-06-30 16:44         ` Edward Cree
2017-06-30 17:34           ` [TEST PATCH] bpf/verifier: roll back ptr&const handling, and fix signed bounds Edward Cree
2017-06-30 18:15           ` [PATCH v3 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier Alexei Starovoitov
2017-07-04 19:22             ` Edward Cree
2017-07-04 22:28               ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-07-06 18:27                 ` Edward Cree
2017-07-07  9:14                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-07-07 12:50                     ` Edward Cree
2017-07-07 13:05                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-07-06 14:07               ` Edward Cree
2017-07-14 20:03 ` [iovisor-dev] " Y Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5953B436.6030506@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
    --cc=iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox