From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D84C4BA24 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FF224672 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726944AbgB0Fxk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:40 -0500 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:55034 "EHLO omr1.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725862AbgB0Fxk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:40 -0500 Received: from mr1.cc.vt.edu (junk.cc.ipv6.vt.edu [IPv6:2607:b400:92:9:0:9d:8fcb:4116]) by omr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 01R5rcgG024154 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:38 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com (mail-qt1-f200.google.com [209.85.160.200]) by mr1.cc.vt.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01R5rXfS000498 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:38 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id d9so2073935qtq.13 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:53:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id; bh=ptwIgNl4i28mcg0Z1zyc5XtWjo/QODMLAPuj6bjdS1w=; b=KM4EcG5AAdSkx5zB/EQj4exA5XQ+HDqdUsyghG4oXcghO5/qgoxmRjuBOqEQvhVX+g 5M1a0jHbHYTDSntrorwiaP67G6pC4fQ2ScYIVcPlOKOZnxfC34TiI1RiwXOMvyLNPTXb rjAL9CWb+UP85FmdPa5yctsjRa9APNLVMlg8ulZeaZ6+Svze5fFIsRxUW9DHHLyfbCce DxoL48t57+w0iOUBk3TKw5jJCWyQIzZv+G7UrhvcPkzGMtRMVtWFUdLEpw93WEYJ+me/ tN8gmMQza6eITnNNL3w2k3QCac9aCelUZgEhSxEYqfAbS2lP8HMC8V7BsqkRomRWEcPB 4V/A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXW3FKZR/38JLXG1camTzrBKnX0b5RhwBh5HPExbI5keiAOOw6Q AxcZJxVBjcQa6euHgh49g7Bjle5uSEWFK1Cb/Ws6H5VXbYOtY1seivKxSsZUVMufgLhlN/kH1hX nBtHh0YmYm87Z8OtIxmekBFlg7jNx/CEPGpc= X-Received: by 2002:aed:36a5:: with SMTP id f34mr2937482qtb.57.1582782813085; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKZNWw/Ucu3Q9y81YAA8eBCVTAtZbF4AqqV3+ZJLEQt/+PiY3p3EXhCgITppc1rAjYtpI8dA== X-Received: by 2002:aed:36a5:: with SMTP id f34mr2937463qtb.57.1582782812775; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from turing-police ([2601:5c0:c001:c9e1::359]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a23sm2500067qko.77.2020.02.26.21.53.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:53:31 -0800 (PST) From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Google-Original-From: "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev To: "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" Cc: "Mori.Takahiro@ab.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" , "Motai.Hirotaka@aj.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove symlink feature : Additional patch In-Reply-To: References: <20200226063746.3128-1-Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp> <503049.1582701983@turing-police> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1582782809_2726P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:53:30 -0500 Message-ID: <59586.1582782810@turing-police> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1582782809_2726P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:14:02 +0000, "Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp" said: > Thanks for comment. > > > Then this should have been [PATCH v2], and the fixed version [PATCH > > v3] > > 2nd patch(Additional patch) not include 1st patch(RFC PATCH). > And the 1st patch has been merged into 'staging-next'. > Now I can't decide. > a) Add only version information to the 2nd patch. > b) Merge the 1st and 2nd patches. > > Which is better for v3? The first part is in-tree, so we don't re-visit it in this case. You want a new patch that consists of *only* the second set of changes, and the changelog for the changes for that patch. --==_Exmh_1582782809_2726P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 iQIVAwUBXldZWQdmEQWDXROgAQIe9g//Wa+udzeaAQxzyO1/RnzWU7l+jHb32Ajw CvOd+3qd7H0qwL5/yvAXUs23rioz3kaCVYVFfqVUMtVZJx6dju+rSvMAgRC6OLb9 akWUEM0iL85V4NcjcQfwkf6koYb6wBrC0OKzfT1QRqUT7yeYTjqUxf2e+loHCHd/ uwGX60hksVsr4IgGRo8+7BISvbR+4DMrc2S6d/Ha2RtXi4FnnOldNcpXMjozCHrS IdyqlkAmS1nG3RQsQ1g+iJo9CmwwZ7BL/OWft8yAMq9DBy2JvmhQmCq/dUeKaFnc EM91Zh6lr2NYuwia+ff51ERDibuWJW10uxKYlnu/yl/0JUtmY6OHWxMxcD5QGaNy F5KgTaRuCaxAsxb5mySNw2xrgu7bdOxVOKr5dSnm1dYeQYzRNG6o8mGsHxqH4JD0 Kbo8Ftr/RYkJYkhEHcpNKxxiwh/+nAFP5g72af1h605hLUJGAL2QsbBFu+/4aK5q x4fsyUvfM78/Q+3tWwR8bPhmEx1hjuD5DNKIKbgEtYE9M9u93YzKcdY34KsE/yIk 2Ycy9IF/mnP2MCUBcqgQmgZaGmjgeqT4qgGWENEzFRR1qYT6T5cvZkCNS57TVqTJ +trmkqBVc2aJD/zYibq5kymmBzGnI11N0lq7+nAnYwIEiUrEmzMXuf90vI7ocaP2 vKVSFcGO0u0= =mg3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1582782809_2726P--