From: wangyijing <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: <chenqilin2@huawei.com>, <hare@suse.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <huangdaode@hisilicon.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, <zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>,
<dingtianhong@huawei.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
<yanaijie@huawei.com>, <hch@lst.de>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<emilne@redhat.com>, <thenzl@redhat.com>, <wefu@redhat.com>,
<charles.chenxin@huawei.com>, <chenweilong@huawei.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] libsas: add wait-complete support to sync discovery event
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:19:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5966D8C0.4090908@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afd1b55c-c5d2-237d-7727-31f7305decaa@huawei.com>
在 2017/7/12 21:51, John Garry 写道:
> On 10/07/2017 08:06, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>
>> static void sas_chain_event(int event, unsigned long *pending,
>> @@ -592,9 +596,9 @@ int sas_discover_event(struct asd_sas_port *port, enum discover_event ev)
>> {
>> struct sas_discovery *disc;
>>
>> + disc = &port->disc;
>> if (!port)
>> return 0;
>> - disc = &port->disc;
>>
>> BUG_ON(ev >= DISC_NUM_EVENTS);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> index 570b2cb..9d26c28 1
>
> I was just looking through the code and I noticed this, above. Is there a specific reason to move the NULL check, or was it modified accidentally?
>
> I mean, if port is NULL I don't think we would get as far as checking it as we would have already de-referenced it.
Oh, sorry, it's a accidental change, good catch, thanks!
>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 7:06 [PATCH v3 0/7] Enhance libsas hotplug feature Yijing Wang
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] libsas: Use static sas event pool to appease sas event lost Yijing Wang
2017-07-11 15:37 ` John Garry
2017-07-12 2:06 ` wangyijing
2017-07-12 8:17 ` John Garry
2017-07-12 8:47 ` wangyijing
2017-07-12 10:13 ` John Garry
2017-07-13 2:13 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] libsas: remove unused port_gone_completion Yijing Wang
2017-07-11 15:54 ` John Garry
2017-07-12 2:18 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] libsas: Use new workqueue to run sas event Yijing Wang
2017-07-14 6:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] libsas: add sas event wait-complete support Yijing Wang
2017-07-14 6:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-14 7:46 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 8:42 ` John Garry
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] libsas: add a new workqueue to run probe/destruct discovery event Yijing Wang
2017-07-12 16:50 ` John Garry
2017-07-13 2:36 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 6:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] libsas: add wait-complete support to sync " Yijing Wang
2017-07-12 13:51 ` John Garry
2017-07-13 2:19 ` wangyijing [this message]
2017-07-14 6:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-10 7:06 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] libsas: release disco mutex during waiting in sas_ex_discover_end_dev Yijing Wang
2017-07-13 16:10 ` John Garry
2017-07-14 1:44 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 8:26 ` John Garry
2017-07-14 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-07-12 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Enhance libsas hotplug feature John Garry
2017-07-12 11:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-07-13 1:27 ` wangyijing
2017-07-13 1:37 ` wangyijing
2017-07-13 8:08 ` John Garry
2017-07-13 8:38 ` wangyijing
2017-07-14 8:19 ` wangyijing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5966D8C0.4090908@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \
--cc=chenqilin2@huawei.com \
--cc=chenweilong@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=huangdaode@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wefu@redhat.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).