linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano@aporeto.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] xen/pvcalls: implement bind command
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:56:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5978AD87.20504@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501017730-12797-5-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org>



On 7/25/2017 5:22 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Send PVCALLS_BIND to the backend. Introduce a new structure, part of
> struct sock_mapping, to store information specific to passive sockets.
>
> Introduce a status field to keep track of the status of the passive
> socket.
>
> Introduce a waitqueue for the "accept" command (see the accept command
> implementation): it is used to allow only one outstanding accept
> command at any given time and to implement polling on the passive
> socket. Introduce a flags field to keep track of in-flight accept and
> poll commands.
>
> sock->sk->sk_send_head is not used for ip sockets: reuse the field to
> store a pointer to the struct sock_mapping corresponding to the socket.
>
> Convert the struct socket pointer into an uint64_t and use it as id for
> the socket to pass to the backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano@aporeto.com>
> CC: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
> CC: jgross@suse.com
> ---
>   drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h |  3 ++
>   2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> index d0f5f42..af2ce20 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,23 @@ struct sock_mapping {
>   
>   			wait_queue_head_t inflight_conn_req;
>   		} active;
> +		struct {
> +		/* Socket status */
> +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_UNINITALIZED  0
> +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_BIND          1
> +#define PVCALLS_STATUS_LISTEN        2
> +			uint8_t status;
> +		/*
> +		 * Internal state-machine flags.
> +		 * Only one accept operation can be inflight for a socket.
> +		 * Only one poll operation can be inflight for a given socket.
> +		 */
> +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT 0
> +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_POLL_INFLIGHT   1
> +#define PVCALLS_FLAG_POLL_RET        2
> +			uint8_t flags;
> +			wait_queue_head_t inflight_accept_req;
> +		} passive;
>   	};
>   };
>   
> @@ -292,6 +309,62 @@ int pvcalls_front_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> +int pvcalls_front_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len)
> +{
> +	struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> +	struct sock_mapping *map = NULL;
> +	struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> +	int notify, req_id, ret;
> +
> +	if (!pvcalls_front_dev)
> +		return -ENOTCONN;
> +	if (addr->sa_family != AF_INET || sock->type != SOCK_STREAM)
> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +	bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> +
> +	map = kzalloc(sizeof(*map), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (map == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	req_id = bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt & (RING_SIZE(&bedata->ring) - 1);
> +	if (RING_FULL(&bedata->ring) ||
> +	    READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) != PVCALLS_INVALID_ID) {
> +		kfree(map);
> +		spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	}
> +	req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> +	req->req_id = req_id;
> +	map->sock = sock;
> +	req->cmd = PVCALLS_BIND;
> +	req->u.bind.id = (uint64_t) sock;
> +	memcpy(req->u.bind.addr, addr, sizeof(*addr));
> +	req->u.bind.len = addr_len;
> +
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&map->passive.inflight_accept_req);
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&map->list, &bedata->socketpass_mappings);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_send_head, (void *)map);
> +	map->active_socket = false;
> +
> +	bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt++;
> +	RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&bedata->ring, notify);
> +	spin_unlock(&bedata->pvcallss_lock);
> +	if (notify)
> +		notify_remote_via_irq(bedata->irq);
> +
> +	wait_event(bedata->inflight_req,
> +		   READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) == req_id);

This all looks very similar to previous patches. Can it be factored out?

Also, you've used wait_event_interruptible in socket() implementation. 
Why not here (and connect())?

-boris

> +
> +	map->passive.status = PVCALLS_STATUS_BIND;
> +	ret = bedata->rsp[req_id].ret;
> +	/* read ret, then set this rsp slot to be reused */
> +	smp_mb();
> +	WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct xenbus_device_id pvcalls_front_ids[] = {
>   	{ "pvcalls" },
>   	{ "" }
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> index 63b0417..8b0a274 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.h
> @@ -6,5 +6,8 @@
>   int pvcalls_front_socket(struct socket *sock);
>   int pvcalls_front_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>   			  int addr_len, int flags);
> +int pvcalls_front_bind(struct socket *sock,
> +		       struct sockaddr *addr,
> +		       int addr_len);
>   
>   #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-26 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-25 21:21 [PATCH v2 00/13] introduce the Xen PV Calls frontend Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] xen/pvcalls: introduce the pvcalls xenbus frontend Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:21   ` [PATCH v2 02/13] xen/pvcalls: connect to the backend Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 13:35     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-27  0:26       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-27 15:07         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-31 21:55           ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 03/13] xen/pvcalls: implement socket command and handle events Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 14:27     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-26 23:19       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 04/13] xen/pvcalls: implement connect command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 14:51     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-26 23:22       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 05/13] xen/pvcalls: implement bind command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 14:56     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2017-07-26 23:59       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-27 14:43         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-31 22:17           ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 06/13] xen/pvcalls: implement listen command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 07/13] xen/pvcalls: implement accept command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 17:52     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-26 23:24       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 08/13] xen/pvcalls: implement sendmsg Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 09/13] xen/pvcalls: implement recvmsg Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 21:21     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-26 21:33       ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-27  0:08         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-27 14:59           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-31 22:26             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 10/13] xen/pvcalls: implement poll command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-26 23:23     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-27  0:21       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 11/13] xen/pvcalls: implement release command Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-27 18:39     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-31 22:34       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-08-01 15:23         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-08-01 15:34           ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-01 15:57             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-09-11 23:56             ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 12/13] xen/pvcalls: implement frontend disconnect Stefano Stabellini
2017-07-25 21:22   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] xen: introduce a Kconfig option to enable the pvcalls frontend Stefano Stabellini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5978AD87.20504@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano@aporeto.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).