From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261967AbTLLWRi (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:17:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262048AbTLLWRh (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:17:37 -0500 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]:44444 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261967AbTLLWRd (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:17:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:17:24 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Ken cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4][PATCH] Xeon HT - SMT+SMP interrupt balancing Message-ID: <59800000.1071267444@flay> In-Reply-To: <3FDA1B5B.8090506@nova.org> References: <3FD89EF5.30101@nova.org> <1316550000.1071163004@[10.10.2.4]> <3FDA1B5B.8090506@nova.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Nitin's patch is in 2.6 - does that work OK for you? >> > > Thanks, Martin -- I wish I could test it. As of -test11, the Adaptec/DPT I2O driver still doesn't build and I need that on this box. I think I understand the error messages, but fixing them is beyond me. It's obviously a known issue, so I don't think I can provide any new info on it. > > Too bad for me -- I'm really looking forward to trying it and stuff like the NAPI for the e1000! The code has been in for ages - so you should be able to use test9 or test10 just fine, if that works better from a driver point of view. M.