Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add missing fsession to the verifier log

[Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>]

On 2026/4/8 12:55 bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org write:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c
> > index 84ab73e08b0e6..94a62fcd4543d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c
> > @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void test_exceptions_success(void)
> >  			       bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.exception_ext_mod_cb_runtime),
> >  			       "exception_cb_mod"), "set_attach_target"))
> >  			goto done;
> > -	}), "FENTRY/FEXIT programs cannot attach to exception callback", 0);
> > +	}), "FENTRY/FEXIT/FSESSION programs cannot attach to exception callback", 0);
> 
> These four selftest locations now expect the string
> "FENTRY/FEXIT/FSESSION programs cannot attach to exception callback",
> but the verifier message they match against was not updated. In
> bpf_check_attach_target() the format string still reads:
> 
>     prog_extension ? "Extension" : "FENTRY/FEXIT");

You are right, I missed this part. I'll update it in the V2.

Thanks!
Menglong Dong

> 
> so the kernel produces "FENTRY/FEXIT programs cannot attach to
> exception callback". The RUN_EXT macro uses strstr() to match the
> expected string against the kernel log buffer, and since
> "FENTRY/FEXIT/FSESSION" is not a substring of "FENTRY/FEXIT programs",
> strstr() returns NULL and the ASSERT_OK_PTR fails.
> 
> Should the verifier message also be updated to include FSESSION, to
> match the selftest expectation? As it stands these four subtests will
> fail.
> 
> > [ ... ]
> 
> 
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
> 
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/24117471086