From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activate CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 17:25:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <598C267D.1060105@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0499138-aa92-a0bb-1032-7112a025257e@rock-chips.com>
Hi shawn,
On 08/10/2017 05:14 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> Hi Jeffy
>
> On 2017/8/10 16:39, jeffy wrote:
>> Hi shawn,
>>
>> On 08/10/2017 04:21 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ enabled, the irq tear down routine
>>> would still access the irq handler registed as a shard irq.
>>> Per the comment within the function of __free_irq, it says
>>> "It's a shared IRQ -- the driver ought to be prepared for
>>> an IRQ event to happen even now it's being freed". However
>>> when failing to probe the driver, it may disable the clock
>>> for accessing the register and the following check for shared
>>> irq state would call the irq handler which accesses the register
>>> w/o the clk enabled. That will hang the system forever.
>>
>> i think this extra irq call is to make sure it's safe to get a shared
>> irq when we are freeing it, and we would not get this irq after freed it.
>>
>> so maybe just call devm_free_irq before disable clks(and other
>> required resources for the irq handler)? and also do it in the
>> rockchip_pcie_remove.
>
> That works since we free it and the following devm_irq_release would
> bail out early. But I know sure if it is the real intention of the
> devm_ irq stuff, although devm_free_irq should be called to free the
> IRQ separately if we want. At least that is so explicit that folks will
> know that, as more from the top view, it seems only a little drivers
> there call devm_free_irq for this case by looking into some more
> drivers(Still no any PCIe drivers do that).
>
> Not sure if their systems are robust enough that could access the
> register w/o clk, even without power domain enabled.
maybe we can use request_irq & free_irq directly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 8:21 [RFC PATCH] PCI: rockchip: fix system hang up if activate CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ Shawn Lin
2017-08-10 8:39 ` jeffy
2017-08-10 9:14 ` Shawn Lin
2017-08-10 9:25 ` jeffy [this message]
2017-08-10 9:27 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-10 9:40 ` jeffy
2017-08-10 11:04 ` Shawn Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=598C267D.1060105@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox