From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752011AbdHLAwM (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:52:12 -0400
Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.140]:39596 "EHLO
        regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751439AbdHLAwL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:52:11 -0400
X-263anti-spam: KSV:0;BIG:0;
X-MAIL-GRAY: 0
X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1
X-KSVirus-check: 0
X-ADDR-CHECKED4: 1
X-ABS-CHECKED: 1
X-SKE-CHECKED: 1
X-ANTISPAM-LEVEL: 2
X-RL-SENDER: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com
X-FST-TO: briannorris@chromium.org
X-SENDER-IP: 103.29.142.67
X-LOGIN-NAME: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com
X-UNIQUE-TAG: <11cf8da5ea40ebd6de677b3db218e9fa>
X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0
X-DNS-TYPE: 0
Message-ID: <598E5133.5050909@rock-chips.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 08:52:03 +0800
From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/19.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: hdmi-codec: Use different name for playback streams
References: <1502440173-23429-1-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20170811165908.GA67191@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170811165908.GA67191@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Brian,

Thanks for noting.

On 08/12/2017 12:59 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Jeffy,
>
> You need to be more careful about the addressee's of your patches. No
> one on To/CC is a maintainer or a sufficiently-targeted mailing list. I
> doubt any of the maintainers will read your patch. (I've added
> alsa-devel for you, but given my understanding of at least Mark's
> patchwork workflow -- and of general patch etiquette -- it's important
> the patch is actually sent there in the first place.)
>
> Probably worth resending.
Ok, will do that.

I was using patman to send it, not sure why it didn't work correctly 
that time...