From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
davem@davemloft.net,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
iovisor-dev <iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 13:52:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5992E090.5040103@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <262cf31a-b70d-3dca-c687-8bcc77726011@solarflare.com>
On 08/14/2017 07:55 PM, Edward Cree wrote:
> State of a register doesn't matter if it wasn't read in reaching an exit;
> a write screens off all reads downstream of it from all explored_states
> upstream of it.
> This allows us to prune many more branches; here are some processed insn
> counts for some Cilium programs:
> Program before after
> bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 6515 3361
> bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 8976 5176
> bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 2960 1137
> bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 95412 48537
> bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 141706 79048
> bpf_netdev.o 24251 17995
> bpf_overlay.o 10999 9385
>
> The runtime is also improved; here are 'time' results in ms:
> Program before after
> bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L3.o 24 6
> bpf_lb_opt_-DLB_L4.o 26 11
> bpf_lb_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 11 2
> bpf_lxc_opt_-DDROP_ALL.o 1288 152
> bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o 1768 257
> bpf_netdev.o 62 31
> bpf_overlay.o 15 13
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Awesome work!
[...]
> if (arg_type == ARG_ANYTHING) {
> if (is_pointer_value(env, regno)) {
> @@ -1639,10 +1675,13 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
> }
>
> /* reset caller saved regs */
> - for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) {
> mark_reg_not_init(regs, caller_saved[i]);
> + check_reg_arg(env, i, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
Don't we need the same in check_ld_abs() since we treat it similar
to a function call?
> + }
>
> /* update return register */
> + check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, DST_OP_NO_MARK);
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-15 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 17:55 [PATCH net-next] bpf/verifier: track liveness for pruning Edward Cree
2017-08-15 11:52 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-08-15 12:53 ` Edward Cree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5992E090.5040103@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=iovisor-dev@lists.iovisor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox