From: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: special handle of scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 11:36:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <599A5542.9060509@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATGwrMBsaps1oVOi_21R8jzTadeWSwaK1dA8nMaJs7KpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Thank you both for those valuable info.
On 08/19/2017 08:42 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
> (+CC Sam)
>
> 2017-08-15 20:02 GMT+09:00 Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>:
>> Masahiro-san,
>>
>> I have a question about make *config. In scripts/kconfig/Makefile, there
>> is following statement:
>>
>> $(obj)/zconf.tab.o: $(obj)/zconf.lex.c $(obj)/zconf.hash.c
>>
>> and the $(obj)/zconf.{tab,hash,lex}.c match the rule in Makefile.lib:
>>
>> $(obj)/%: $(src)/%_shipped
>> $(call cmd,shipped)
>>
>> and cmd_shipped just transform the _shipped file to .c via `cat`.
>>
>> And zconf.tab.c includes several *other* .c files which make the whole
>> process a little obscure, because there are not corresponding .o files
>> for the *other* .c files.
>>
>> My questions is: Does this special handling has other meanings that I
>> may miss? Or just legacy.
>
>
>
>> Because a straightforward way in my mind would be:
>>
>> rename zconf.{tab,hash,lex}.c_shipped to zconf.{tab,hash,lex}.c, then
>> has following in the Makefile
>>
>> common-objs := zconf.tab.o zconf.hash.o zconf.lex.o util.o etc...
>> conf-objs := conf.o $(common-objs)
>>
>
>
>
> Here, we have one more question.
>
>
> Can we generate zconf.{tab,hash,lex}.c from zconf.{y,gperf,l}
> instead of from *_shipped?
>
> This is also possible, technically.
> But, I do not know if it is acceptable to have
> more external tool dependencies.
> (So, I sent RFC patches to hear more opinions.)
>
I think this is good for the new comers who don't know those tools
before. When I come to here. I just noticed that kbuild will cat
*_shipped file to the corresponding .c file, and miss the part that the
.c file is actually created by the tools.
And another new-comer friendly improvement may be something like: remove
"include *.c" lines in zconf.y, and modify makefile like I said above.
So I will not get confused when I see symbols within certain .c file is
used while don't see the certain .o file.
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-15 11:02 special handle of scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o Cao jin
2017-08-19 12:42 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-08-19 14:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2017-08-19 15:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2017-08-21 3:36 ` Cao jin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=599A5542.9060509@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox