From: zhouchengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:23:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59C9AC08.9000302@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170925154057.191e3fd1@vmware.local.home>
On 2017/9/26 3:40, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:51:49 +0800
> Zhou Chengming<zhouchengming1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> push_rt_task() pick the first pushable task and find an eligible
>> lowest_rq, then double_lock_balance(rq, lowest_rq). So if
>> double_lock_balance() unlock the rq (when double_lock_balance() return 1),
>> we have to check if this task is still on the rq.
>>
>> The problem is that the check conditions are not sufficient:
>>
>> if (unlikely(task_rq(task) != rq ||
>> !cpumask_test_cpu(lowest_rq->cpu,&task->cpus_allowed) ||
>> task_running(rq, task) ||
>> !rt_task(task) ||
>> !task_on_rq_queued(task))) {
>>
>> cpu2 cpu1 cpu0
>> push_rt_task(rq1)
>> pick task_A on rq1
>> find rq0
>> double_lock_balance(rq1, rq0)
>> unlock(rq1)
>> rq1 __schedule
>> pick task_A run
>> task_A sleep (dequeued)
>> lock(rq0)
>> lock(rq1)
>> do_above_check(task_A)
>> task_rq(task_A) == rq1
>> cpus_allowed unchanged
>> task_running == false
>> rt_task(task_A) == true
>> try_to_wake_up(task_A)
>> select_cpu = cpu3
>> enqueue(rq3, task_A)
> How can this happen? The try_to_wake_up(task_A) needs to grab the rq
> that task A is on, and we have that rq lock.
>
> /me confused.
>
> -- Steve
Thanks for the reply!
After the task_A sleep on cpu1, the try_to_wake_up(task_A) on cpu0 select a different cpu3,
so it will grab the rq3 lock, not the rq1 lock.
Thanks.
>
>> task_A->on_rq = 1
>> task_on_rq_queued(task_A)
>> above_check passed, return rq0
>> ...
>> migrate task_A from rq1 to rq0
>>
>> So we can't rely on these checks of task_A to make sure the task_A is
>> still on the rq1, even though we hold the rq1->lock. This patch will
>> repick the first pushable task to be sure the task is still on the rq.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming<zhouchengming1@huawei.com>
>>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-26 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 6:51 [PATCH] sched/rt.c: pick and check task if double_lock_balance() unlock the rq Zhou Chengming
2017-09-12 2:11 ` zhouchengming
2017-09-25 11:53 ` zhouchengming
2017-09-25 19:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-26 1:23 ` zhouchengming [this message]
2017-09-26 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-10-07 3:30 ` zhouchengming
2018-04-10 22:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-11 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-12 8:54 ` Libin (Huawei)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59C9AC08.9000302@huawei.com \
--to=zhouchengming1@huawei.com \
--cc=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).