From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
"sp3485@columbia.edu" <sp3485@columbia.edu>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] Fix for BPF devmap percpu allocation splat
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:11:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59E61D8F.5000505@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD009980D@AcuExch.aculab.com>
On 10/17/2017 05:03 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann
>> Sent: 17 October 2017 15:56
>>
>> The set fixes a splat in devmap percpu allocation when we alloc
>> the flush bitmap. Patch 1 is a prerequisite for the fix in patch 2,
>> patch 1 is rather small, so if this could be routed via -net, for
>> example, with Tejun's Ack that would be good. Patch 3 gets rid of
>> remaining PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE checks, which are percpu allocator
>> internals and should not be used.
>
> Does it make sense to allow the user program to try to allocate ever
> smaller very large maps until it finds one that succeeds - thus
> using up all the percpu space?
>
> Or is this a 'root only' 'shoot self in foot' job?
It's root only although John still has a pending fix to be flushed
out for -net first in the next days to actually enforce that cap
(devmap is not in an official kernel yet at this point, so all good),
but apart from this, all map allocs in general are accounted for
as well.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 14:55 [PATCH net 0/3] Fix for BPF devmap percpu allocation splat Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-17 14:55 ` [PATCH net 1/3] mm, percpu: add support for __GFP_NOWARN flag Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-17 15:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-17 14:55 ` [PATCH net 2/3] bpf: fix splat for illegal devmap percpu allocation Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-17 15:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-17 16:28 ` John Fastabend
2017-10-17 14:55 ` [PATCH net 3/3] bpf: do not test for PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE before percpu allocations Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-17 15:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-17 16:29 ` John Fastabend
2017-10-17 15:03 ` [PATCH net 0/3] Fix for BPF devmap percpu allocation splat David Laight
2017-10-17 15:11 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-10-18 13:25 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-18 14:03 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-18 14:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-18 15:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-10-18 15:31 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-10-18 21:45 ` Dennis Zhou
2017-10-21 16:00 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-19 12:14 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59E61D8F.5000505@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sp3485@columbia.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox