From: jeffy <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
heiko@sntech.de, briannorris@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org,
tfiga@chromium.org, broonie@kernel.org, seanpaul@chromium.org,
thierry.reding@gmail.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Make sure device detached from driver before deleting it
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:11:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59E736C8.3080002@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1742035.QldI8RN9SY@aspire.rjw.lan>
Hi Rafael,
Thanks for your reply.
On 10/18/2017 06:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> But device_del() calls bus_remove_device() which in turn calls
> device_release_driver(), so this looks like an ordering issue to me.
>
uh, right, didn't notice that, it indeed to be a ordering issue...
it turns out in device_del() we are calling device_links_purge() before
bus_remove_device()...
> What*exactly* is not working? Or rather, what symptoms do you see?
>
my board has these devices:
spi master device->spi child device->spi based pwm->pwm_bl
and i add a device link to the pwm and pwm_bl, and got a warning about
the pwm not unbound:
static void device_links_purge(struct device *dev)
{
...
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(link, ln,
&dev->links.consumers, s_node) {
WARN_ON(link->status != DL_STATE_DORMANT &&
link->status != DL_STATE_NONE); <-- warning here!
__device_link_del(link);
}
and i was confused by:
static void mac80211_hwsim_del_radio(struct mac80211_hwsim_data *data,
const char *hwname,
struct genl_info *info)
{
...
device_release_driver(data->dev);
device_unregister(data->dev);
and adding that device_release_driver hide that issue(oops...)
so we should move device_links_purge() after bus_remove_device() in
device_del() right? maybe after device_remove_properties(), and that did
solve the issue :)
> Thanks,
> Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-18 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-18 5:49 [PATCH] driver core: Make sure device detached from driver before deleting it Jeffy Chen
2017-10-18 6:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-10-18 7:06 ` jeffy
2017-10-18 7:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-10-18 8:32 ` jeffy
2017-10-18 9:47 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-18 10:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-18 10:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-18 11:11 ` jeffy [this message]
2017-10-18 11:32 ` jeffy
2017-10-18 11:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-18 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59E736C8.3080002@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox