Re: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if allocation fails

[Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Yi,

On 10/19/2017 02:40 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: iommu-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
>> bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Lu Baolu
>> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 8:39 AM
>> To: joro@8bytes.org; dwmw2@infradead.org
>> Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Missing checks for pasid tables if allocation fails
>>
>> intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables() might return an error but never be checked by the
>> callers. Later when intel_svm_bind_mm() is called, there are no checks for valid pasid
>> tables before enabling them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c index
>> f6697e5..43280ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int
>> flags, struct svm_dev_
>>  	int pasid_max;
>>  	int ret;
>>
>> -	if (WARN_ON(!iommu))
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!iommu || !iommu->pasid_table))
> [Liu, Yi L] Hi Baolu, I guess there also need a check to iommu->ecap , see if the pasid bit
> is reported. thoughts?
>

If pasid bit is not set in ecap register, iommu->pasid_table won't be set.

We did this by:

                if (pasid_enabled(iommu))
                        intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(iommu);

Best regards,
Lu Baolu