From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
alim.akhtar@samsung.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
Zang Leigang <zangleigang@hisilicon.com>,
Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@wdc.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
stanley.chu@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:56:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a62fc17ec9229a8498e696eb0474be@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302132503.224670-7-avri.altman@wdc.com>
On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote:
> The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when
> the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2).
>
> We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the
> next
> read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> index 0744feb4d484..0034fa03fdc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct
> ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> if (rgn->reads == ACTIVATION_THRESHOLD)
> activate = true;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rgn->rgn_lock, flags);
> - if (activate) {
> + if (activate ||
> + test_and_clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags)) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_idx, srgn_idx);
> hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt++;
> @@ -1480,6 +1481,20 @@ void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> case HPB_RSP_DEV_RESET:
> dev_warn(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
> "UFS device lost HPB information during PM.\n");
> +
> + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
> + struct scsi_device *sdev;
> +
> + __shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
> + struct ufshpb_lu *h = sdev->hostdata;
> +
> + if (!h)
> + continue;
> +
> + schedule_work(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
> + }
> + }
> +
> break;
> default:
> dev_notice(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
> @@ -1594,6 +1609,25 @@ static void
> ufshpb_run_inactive_region_list(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rsp_list_lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static void ufshpb_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu() does
not
seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work?
Thanks,
Can Guo.
> +{
> + struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
> + struct victim_select_info *lru_info;
> + struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + hpb = container_of(work, struct ufshpb_lu, ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
> +
> + lru_info = &hpb->lru_info;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(rgn, &lru_info->lh_lru_rgn, list_lru_rgn)
> + set_bit(RGN_FLAG_UPDATE, &rgn->rgn_flags);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpb->rgn_state_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> static void ufshpb_normalization_work_handler(struct work_struct
> *work)
> {
> struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
> @@ -1798,6 +1832,8 @@ static int ufshpb_alloc_region_tbl(struct
> ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
> } else {
> rgn->rgn_state = HPB_RGN_INACTIVE;
> }
> +
> + rgn->rgn_flags = 0;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -2012,9 +2048,12 @@ static int ufshpb_lu_hpb_init(struct ufs_hba
> *hba, struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hpb->list_hpb_lu);
>
> INIT_WORK(&hpb->map_work, ufshpb_map_work_handler);
> - if (hpb->is_hcm)
> + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
> INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work,
> ufshpb_normalization_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work,
> + ufshpb_reset_work_handler);
> + }
>
> hpb->map_req_cache = kmem_cache_create("ufshpb_req_cache",
> sizeof(struct ufshpb_req), 0, 0, NULL);
> @@ -2114,8 +2153,10 @@ static void ufshpb_discard_rsp_lists(struct
> ufshpb_lu *hpb)
>
> static void ufshpb_cancel_jobs(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb)
> {
> - if (hpb->is_hcm)
> + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
> + cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_lun_reset_work);
> cancel_work_sync(&hpb->ufshpb_normalization_work);
> + }
> cancel_work_sync(&hpb->map_work);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> index 84598a317897..37c1b0ea0c0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct ufshpb_region {
> struct list_head list_lru_rgn;
> unsigned long rgn_flags;
> #define RGN_FLAG_DIRTY 0
> +#define RGN_FLAG_UPDATE 1
>
> /* region reads - for host mode */
> spinlock_t rgn_lock;
> @@ -217,6 +218,7 @@ struct ufshpb_lu {
> /* for selecting victim */
> struct victim_select_info lru_info;
> struct work_struct ufshpb_normalization_work;
> + struct work_struct ufshpb_lun_reset_work;
>
> /* pinned region information */
> u32 lu_pinned_start;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 13:24 [PATCH v5 00/10] Add Host control mode to HPB Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] scsi: ufshpb: Cache HPB Control mode on init Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to rsp_upiu Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add region's reads counter Avri Altman
2021-03-11 7:52 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 8:04 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-11 8:07 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 3:16 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 9:20 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 9:31 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 9:19 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:40 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 9:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's reads Avri Altman
2021-03-11 7:53 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 8:06 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:30 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:34 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: ufshpb: Region inactivation in host mode Avri Altman
2021-03-11 8:20 ` Can Guo
2021-03-11 9:03 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 4:02 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:33 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:30 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 1:23 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 2:28 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 4:41 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 5:19 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 5:34 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 5:42 ` Daejun Park
2021-03-17 7:59 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response Avri Altman
2021-03-15 1:34 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 6:40 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:42 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 10:56 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-03-17 11:23 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 12:12 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 12:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 13:50 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 14:22 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 14:36 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 15:46 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-18 1:00 ` Can Guo
2021-03-18 8:04 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add "Cold" regions timer Avri Altman
2021-03-15 1:37 ` Can Guo
2021-03-15 7:54 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-15 9:36 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 9:21 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-17 2:45 ` Can Guo
2021-03-17 7:55 ` Avri Altman
2021-06-01 16:22 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] scsi: ufshpb: Limit the number of inflight map requests Avri Altman
2021-03-15 8:31 ` Can Guo
2021-03-16 8:32 ` Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add support for host control mode Avri Altman
2021-03-02 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] scsi: ufshpb: Make host mode parameters configurable Avri Altman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59a62fc17ec9229a8498e696eb0474be@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avi.shchislowski@wdc.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=zangleigang@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox