From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1758062AbeAIFnD (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Tue, 9 Jan 2018 00:43:03 -0500
Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]:64193 "EHLO
        relay1.mentorg.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1757182AbeAIFnC (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 9 Jan 2018 00:43:02 -0500
Message-ID: <5A54565C.70805@mentor.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 21:42:52 -0800
From: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120411 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
        <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tiwai@suse.com>,
        <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Applied "ASoC: rsnd: ssi: fix race condition in rsnd_ssi_pointer_update"
 to the asoc tree
References: <E1eNNl3-0003pn-VV@debutante> <661598a7-b62c-074a-a12e-12ed87f4700e@sakamocchi.jp> <20171211113809.GA9854@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20171211113809.GA9854@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-08.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.208) To
 svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>

Hi Mark

Only the first patch in
https://www.spinics.net/lists/alsa-devel/msg71021.html
was applied, but the second patch "ASoC: rsnd: ssi: remove unnesessary 
period_pos"
was missed

Could you please have a look


Thanks,
Jiada

On 12/11/2017 03:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 02:22:50PM +0900, Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>> On Dec 9 2017 03:52, Mark Brown wrote:
>> The applied patches are in v1 patchset, but we have v2 patchset already:
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2017-December/128970.html
>> Would you please replace the applied patches with the renewed ones? There're
>> slight differences between them.
> As far as I can tell what's applied is v2?