From: JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jcliang@chromium.org, xxm@rock-chips.com, tfiga@chromium.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, aisheng.dong@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/13] iommu/rockchip: Control clocks needed to access the IOMMU
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:45:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A6AF8BB.4040601@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f06d2d9f-3869-ed02-43f4-f4ea4a104a57@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
Thanks for your reply.
On 01/24/2018 09:49 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- clocks : A list of master clocks requires for the IOMMU to be
>> accessible
>
> s/requires/required/
ok
>
>> + by the host CPU. The number of clocks depends on the master
>> + block and might as well be zero. See [1] for generic clock
>
> Oops, some subtleties of English here :)
>
> To say "the number of clocks ... might as well be zero" effectively
> implies "there's no point ever specifying any clocks". I guess what you
> really mean here is "...might well be...", i.e. it is both valid and
> reasonably likely to require zero clocks.
ok
>
>> + bindings description.
>> +
>> +[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
>> Optional properties:
>> - rockchip,disable-mmu-reset : Don't use the mmu reset operation.
>> @@ -27,5 +34,6 @@ Example:
>> reg = <0xff940300 0x100>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> interrupt-names = "vopl_mmu";
>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_VOP1>, <&cru DCLK_VOP1>, <&cru HCLK_VOP1>;
>> #iommu-cells = <0>;
>> };
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> index c4131ca792e0..8a5e2a659b67 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/rockchip-iommu.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> */
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> #include <linux/compiler.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> @@ -91,6 +92,8 @@ struct rk_iommu {
>> struct device *dev;
>> void __iomem **bases;
>> int num_mmu;
>> + struct clk_bulk_data *clocks;
>> + int num_clocks;
>> bool reset_disabled;
>> struct iommu_device iommu;
>> struct list_head node; /* entry in rk_iommu_domain.iommus */
>> @@ -450,6 +453,38 @@ static int rk_iommu_force_reset(struct rk_iommu
>> *iommu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static int rk_iommu_of_get_clocks(struct rk_iommu *iommu)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np = iommu->dev->of_node;
>> + int ret;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + ret = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "clocks", "#clock-cells");
>> + if (ret == -ENOENT)
>> + return 0;
>> + else if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + iommu->num_clocks = ret;
>> + iommu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(iommu->dev, iommu->num_clocks,
>> + sizeof(*iommu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!iommu->clocks)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < iommu->num_clocks; ++i) {
>> + iommu->clocks[i].clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
>> + if (IS_ERR(iommu->clocks[i].clk)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(iommu->clocks[i].clk);
>> + goto err_clk_put;
>> + }
>> + }
>
> Just to confirm my understanding from a quick scan through the code, the
> reason we can't use clk_bulk_get() here is that currently, clocks[i].id
> being NULL means we'd end up just getting the first clock multiple
> times, right?
right, without a valid name, it would return the first clock.
/* Walk up the tree of devices looking for a clock that matches */
while (np) {
int index = 0;
/*
* For named clocks, first look up the name in the
* "clock-names" property. If it cannot be found, then
* index will be an error code, and of_clk_get() will fail.
*/
if (name)
index = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", name);
clk = __of_clk_get(np, index, dev_id, name);
>
> I guess there could be other users who also want "just get whatever
> clocks I have" functionality, so it might be worth proposing that for
> the core API as a separate/follow-up patch, but it definitely doesn't
> need to be part of this series.
right, i can try to do it later :)
>
> I really don't know enough about correct clk API usage, but modulo the
> binding comments it certainly looks nice and tidy now;
>
> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 10:35 [PATCH v5 00/13] iommu/rockchip: Use OF_IOMMU Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] iommu/rockchip: Prohibit unbind and remove Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] iommu/rockchip: Fix error handling in probe Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] iommu/rockchip: Request irqs in rk_iommu_probe() Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] iommu/rockchip: Fix error handling in attach Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] iommu/rockchip: Use iopoll helpers to wait for hardware Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] iommu/rockchip: Fix TLB flush of secondary IOMMUs Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] ARM: dts: rockchip: add clocks in vop iommu nodes Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] iommu/rockchip: Control clocks needed to access the IOMMU Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 13:49 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-26 9:45 ` JeffyChen [this message]
2018-02-14 10:03 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-02-14 11:27 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-01-30 17:05 ` Rob Herring
2018-01-31 7:52 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-01-31 13:50 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <5A72F7D2.1050201@rock-chips.com>
[not found] ` <5A8FEBC6.4000408@rock-chips.com>
2018-02-27 16:59 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-28 13:00 ` JeffyChen
2018-02-28 15:06 ` Robin Murphy
2018-03-01 1:37 ` JeffyChen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] iommu/rockchip: Use IOMMU device for dma mapping operations Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] iommu/rockchip: Use OF_IOMMU to attach devices automatically Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] iommu/rockchip: Fix error handling in init Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] iommu/rockchip: Add runtime PM support Jeffy Chen
2018-01-24 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] iommu/rockchip: Support sharing IOMMU between masters Jeffy Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A6AF8BB.4040601@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jcliang@chromium.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox