From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] drm/exynos: g2d: use monotonic timestamps
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 09:05:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A78F15B.30707@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117170131.2677586-1-arnd@arndb.de>
2018년 01월 18일 02:01에 Arnd Bergmann 이(가) 쓴 글:
> The exynos DRM driver uses real-time 'struct timeval' values
> for exporting its timestamps to user space. This has multiple
> problems:
>
> 1. signed seconds overflow in y2038
> 2. the 'struct timeval' definition is deprecated in the kernel
> 3. time may jump or go backwards after a 'settimeofday()' syscall
> 4. other DRM timestamps are in CLOCK_MONOTONIC domain, so they
> can't be compared
> 5. exporting microseconds requires a division by 1000, which may
> be slow on some architectures.
>
> The code existed in two places before, but the IPP portion was
> removed in 8ded59413ccc ("drm/exynos: ipp: Remove Exynos DRM
> IPP subsystem"), so we no longer need to worry about it.
>
> Ideally timestamps should just use 64-bit nanoseconds instead, but
> of course we can't change that now. Instead, this tries to address
> the first four points above by using monotonic 'timespec' values.
>
> According to Tobias Jakobi, user space doesn't care about the
> timestamp at the moment, so we can change the format. Even if
> there is something looking at them, it will work just fine with
> monotonic times as long as the application only looks at the
> relative values between two events.
>
> Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10038593/
> Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Picked it up.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> ---
> v2: rebased to what will be in 4.15, now that ipp is gone,
> updated changelog text based on input from Tobias.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> index 2b8bf2dd6387..9effe40f5fa5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c
> @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static void g2d_finish_event(struct g2d_data *g2d, u32 cmdlist_no)
> struct drm_device *drm_dev = g2d->subdrv.drm_dev;
> struct g2d_runqueue_node *runqueue_node = g2d->runqueue_node;
> struct drm_exynos_pending_g2d_event *e;
> - struct timeval now;
> + struct timespec64 now;
>
> if (list_empty(&runqueue_node->event_list))
> return;
> @@ -934,9 +934,9 @@ static void g2d_finish_event(struct g2d_data *g2d, u32 cmdlist_no)
> e = list_first_entry(&runqueue_node->event_list,
> struct drm_exynos_pending_g2d_event, base.link);
>
> - do_gettimeofday(&now);
> + ktime_get_ts64(&now);
> e->event.tv_sec = now.tv_sec;
> - e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
> + e->event.tv_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> e->event.cmdlist_no = cmdlist_no;
>
> drm_send_event(drm_dev, &e->base);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-06 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20180117170211epcas5p12a9b274b2b0d0b0522c909be3644eebb@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2018-01-17 17:01 ` [PATCH] [v2] drm/exynos: g2d: use monotonic timestamps Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-17 18:16 ` Tobias Jakobi
2018-02-06 0:05 ` Inki Dae [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A78F15B.30707@samsung.com \
--to=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox