Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Input: gpio-keys - add support for wakeup event action

[JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>]

Hi Enric,

Thanks for your reply.

On 02/14/2018 06:25 AM, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2018-02-13 19:25 GMT+01:00 Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>:
>> Hi Enric,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>>> On 12/02/18 23:13, Brian Norris wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 07:09:05PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
>>>>> Add support for specifying event actions to trigger wakeup when using
>>>>> the gpio-keys input device as a wakeup source.
>>>>>
>>>>> This would allow the device to configure when to wakeup the system. For
>>>>> example a gpio-keys input device for pen insert, may only want to wakeup
>>>>> the system when ejecting the pen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>> Specify wakeup event action instead of irq trigger type as Brian
>>>>> suggested.
>> [...]
>>> Not sure if you were aware but there is also some discussion related to this,
>>> maybe we can join the efforts?
>>>
>>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10208261/
>>> v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10211147/
>>
>> Thanks for the pointers. IIUC, that's talking about a different problem:
>> how to utilize a GPIO key in level-triggered mode. That touches similar
>> code, but it doesn't really have anything to do with configuring a
>> different wakeup trigger type.
>>
>
> Right, sorry. I see now what you are doing.
>
>> The two patches would need to be reconciled, if they both are going to
>> be merged. But otherwise, I think they're perfectly fine to be separate.
>>
>
> Yes, that's why I got confused, I had those patches applied on my tree
> and when I tried to apply these failed and I wrongly assumed that were
> doing the same. Waiting to test the third version ;)
right, they are not related, and i should add the level irq case after 
that series merged :)

>
> Thanks,
>   Enric
>
>> Brian
>
>
>