From: JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: power-domain: remove PM clocks
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 17:09:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A97C345.3060205@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdU9PFAXwo+1Z7Baw1fanst9yFKZ3ohoSTiQiMKTaYMVVw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your reply.
On 03/01/2018 04:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >so maybe we can:
>> >1/ let the device(dts) or driver decide which clock is PM clk, and add it
>> >using*pm_clk_add* APIs (even of_pm_clk_add_clks() if all clocks are pm clk)
>> >
>> >2/ add support for critical PM clk, which would return error to the driver
>> >if anything wrong
>> >
>> >3/ make sure PM clk always be controlled(otherwise it might be unexpected
>> >disabled by other clocks under the same clk parent?):
>> > a) make sure Runtime PM is always enabled. and as discussed, we can select
>> >PM in ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> On Renesas SoCs, we only add the device's module clock with pm_clk_add().
> Drivers that don't care about properties of the module clock just call
> pm_runtime_*(). That way the same driver works on different SoCs using
> the same device, with and without power and/or clock domains.
well, i think we may need to check:
1/ so the driver might not know is the clock really enabled(currently):
static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
{
if (!ce->clk)
ce->clk = clk_get(dev, ce->con_id);
if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
static inline void __pm_clk_enable(struct device *dev, struct
pm_clock_entry *ce)
{
int ret;
if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
ret = clk_enable(ce->clk);
if (!ret)
ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ENABLED;
it seems the status is private.
2/ the pm_clk_resume/suspend seems only be called in the domain's
suspend/resume ops(or USE_PM_CLK_RUNTIME_OPS, or called directly in the
drivers for example tegra-aconnect):
# cgrep pm_clk_resume -w
./include/linux/pm_clock.h:50:extern int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev);
./include/linux/pm_clock.h:83:#define pm_clk_resume NULL
./drivers/bus/tegra-aconnect.c:62: return pm_clk_resume(dev);
./drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c:649: ret = pm_clk_resume(dev);
./drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:421: * pm_clk_resume - Enable clocks in
a device's PM clock list.
./drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:424:int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
./drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:444:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_clk_resume);
./drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:533: ret = pm_clk_resume(dev);
./drivers/base/power/domain.c:1685: genpd->dev_ops.start =
pm_clk_resume;
./drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-pm.c:36: ret = pm_clk_resume(dev);
so if the device doesn't have a power domain, the PM clks could be
unmanaged right?
by the way, the tegra drivers(tegra-aconnect/tegra210-adma) seems like
good examples of using current PM clks...
but anyway, force adding all clocks as PM clks in the rockchip power
domain driver seems wrong...
>
> Drivers that care about properties of the module clock (mainly frequency)
> can still use the clk_*() API for that. Other (optional) clocks must be
> handled by the device driver itself.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-01 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 11:11 [PATCH] soc: rockchip: power-domain: remove PM clocks Jeffy Chen
2018-02-28 11:59 ` Heiko Stübner
2018-02-28 12:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-28 12:29 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-02-28 12:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-28 12:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-02-28 13:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-28 14:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2018-03-01 3:40 ` JeffyChen
2018-03-01 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-03-01 9:09 ` JeffyChen [this message]
2018-03-01 10:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-03-01 10:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-03-01 11:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2018-03-01 11:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-28 12:36 ` JeffyChen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A97C345.3060205@rock-chips.com \
--to=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox