From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751274AbeDDLKj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:10:39 -0400 Received: from regular1.263xmail.com ([211.150.99.130]:48668 "EHLO regular1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750827AbeDDLKi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 07:10:38 -0400 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 0 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 1 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-IP-DOMAINF: 1 X-RL-SENDER: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: djkurtz@chromium.org X-SENDER-IP: 103.29.142.67 X-LOGIN-NAME: jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Message-ID: <5AC4B29C.8090002@rock-chips.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 19:10:20 +0800 From: JeffyChen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130126 Thunderbird/19.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Kurtz CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ricky Liang , Robin Murphy , xxm , Tomasz Figa , Heiko Stuebner , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/14] iommu/rockchip: Use OF_IOMMU to attach devices automatically References: <20180323073814.5802-1-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <20180323073814.5802-12-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> <5AB8A7F0.1090305@rock-chips.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Daniel, Thanks for your reply. On 04/04/2018 12:11 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > Hi Jeffy, > > Sorry for delayed response. > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 1:58 AM JeffyChen wrote: > >> Hi Daniel, > >> Thanks for your reply. > >> On 03/26/2018 02:31 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >>>>> +struct rk_iommudata { >>>>> + struct rk_iommu *iommu; >>>>> +}; >>> Why do we need this struct? Can't we just assign a pointer to struct >>> rk_iommu directly to dev->archdata.iommu? >>> >> hmmm, i was trying to add more device related data in patch[13]: > >> struct rk_iommudata { >> + struct device_link *link; /* runtime PM link from IOMMU to master > */ >> struct rk_iommu *iommu; >> }; >>> > > Can't you just add link to rk_iommu directly? adding link to rk_iommu would be fine if we only have one master device per rk_iommu. but now we are supporting multiple master devices sharing a iommu device :) > > >