From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
To: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 09:43:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B173C27.30401@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834fde1b-5ae0-afc6-283f-2a470757e54a@arm.com>
Hi, Julien
On 2018/6/5 18:16, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> On 05/06/18 07:30, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> When the kernel booted with maxcpus=x, 'x' is smaller
>> than actual cpu numbers, the TAs of offline cpus won't
>> be set to its->collection.
>>
>> If LPI is bind to offline cpu, sync cmd will use zero TA,
>> it leads to ITS queue timeout. Fix this by choosing a
>> online cpu, if there is no online cpu in cpu_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> index 5416f2b..edd92a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
>> @@ -2309,7 +2309,9 @@ static int its_irq_domain_activate(struct
>> irq_domain *domain,
>> cpu_mask = cpumask_of_node(its_dev->its->numa_node);
>> /* Bind the LPI to the first possible CPU */
>> - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_mask);
>> + cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpu_mask, cpu_online_mask);
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Testing for cpu being online here feels a bit redundant.
>
> Since cpu is online if the cpumask_first_and returns a valid cpu, I
> think you could replace this test with:
>
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
Yes, I used wrong check here, according to comment of cpumask_first_and,
this func will returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set in both.
I'll send v2 later.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> its_dev->event_map.col_map[event] = cpu;
>> irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
>> @@ -2466,7 +2468,10 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct
>> irq_data *d,
>> bool force)
>> {
>> struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>> - int cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
>> + int cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
>> +
>> + if (!cpu_online(cpu))
>
> Same thing here.
>
>> + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
>> /*
>> * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
>>
>
> Cheers,
>
Thanks,
Yang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 6:30 [PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: fix ITS queue timeout Yang Yingliang
2018-06-05 10:16 ` Julien Thierry
2018-06-06 1:43 ` Yang Yingliang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B173C27.30401@huawei.com \
--to=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox