From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86l <x86@kernel.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <yaomin2@huawei.com>
Subject: Is this a kernel BUG? ///Re: [Question] Can we use SIGRTMIN when vdso disabled on X86?
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:52:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B1792C9.8010203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5B1672FE.4050705@huawei.com>
On 2018/6/5 19:24, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> After I executed "echo 0 > /proc/sys/abi/vsyscall32" to disable vdso, the rt_sigaction01 test case from ltp_2015 failed.
> The test case source code please refer to the attachment, and the output as blow:
>
> -----------------
> ./rt_sigaction01
> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : signal: 34
> rt_sigaction01 1 TPASS : rt_sigaction call succeeded: result = 0
> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : sa.sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND|SA_SIGINFO
> rt_sigaction01 0 TINFO : Signal Handler Called with signal number 34
>
> Segmentation fault
> ------------------
>
>
> Is this the desired result? In function ia32_setup_rt_frame, I found below code:
>
> if (ksig->ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_RESTORER)
> restorer = ksig->ka.sa.sa_restorer;
> else
> restorer = current->mm->context.vdso +
> vdso_image_32.sym___kernel_rt_sigreturn;
> put_user_ex(ptr_to_compat(restorer), &frame->pretcode);
>
> Because the vdso is disabled, so current->mm->context.vdso is NULL, which cause the result of frame->pretcode invalid.
>
> I'm not sure whether this is a kernel bug or just an error of test case itself. Can anyone help me?
>
--
Thanks!
BestRegards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-06 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-05 11:24 [Question] Can we use SIGRTMIN when vdso disabled on X86? Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-06-06 7:52 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2018-06-06 9:17 ` Is this a kernel BUG? ///Re: " Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-06-06 17:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 2:05 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-06-07 2:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-07 3:10 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-06-06 17:48 ` hpa
2018-06-07 1:45 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2018-06-07 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B1792C9.8010203@huawei.com \
--to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yaomin2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox