From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: xiubli@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz, jannh@google.com,
pkalever@redhat.com, pkarampu@redhat.com, atumball@redhat.com,
sabose@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] uio: fix crash after the device is unregistered
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:23:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5B3FB3B0.7010105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1530845836-49101-4-git-send-email-xiubli@redhat.com>
On 07/05/2018 09:57 PM, xiubli@redhat.com wrote:
> static irqreturn_t uio_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct uio_device *idev = (struct uio_device *)dev_id;
> - irqreturn_t ret = idev->info->handler(irq, idev->info);
> + irqreturn_t ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock);
> + if (!idev->info) {
> + ret = IRQ_NONE;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> + ret = idev->info->handler(irq, idev->info);
> if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> uio_event_notify(idev->info);
>
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&idev->info_lock);
> return ret;
> }
Do you need the interrupt related changes in this patch and the first
one? When we do uio_unregister_device -> free_irq does free_irq return
when there are no longer running interrupt handlers that we requested?
If that is not the case then I think we can hit a similar bug. We do:
__uio_register_device -> device_register -> device's refcount goes to
zero so we do -> uio_device_release -> kfree(idev)
and if it is possible the interrupt handler could still run after
free_irq then we would end up doing:
uio_interrupt -> mutex_lock(&idev->info_lock) -> idev access freed memory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-06 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-06 2:57 [PATCH v3 0/3] uio: fix potential crash bug xiubli
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] uio: use request_threaded_irq instead xiubli
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] uio: change to use the mutex lock instead of the spin lock xiubli
2018-07-06 3:39 ` Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 2:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] uio: fix crash after the device is unregistered xiubli
2018-07-06 3:40 ` Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 18:23 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2018-07-07 1:28 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-09 17:06 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-10 2:40 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-06 18:58 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-07 1:47 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-09 16:40 ` Mike Christie
2018-07-10 2:36 ` Xiubo Li
2018-07-06 3:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] uio: fix potential crash bug Hamish Martin
2018-07-06 12:04 ` Xiubo Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5B3FB3B0.7010105@redhat.com \
--to=mchristi@redhat.com \
--cc=atumball@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hamish.martin@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkalever@redhat.com \
--cc=pkarampu@redhat.com \
--cc=sabose@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox