Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy:phy-brcm-us: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to replace the open code

[zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>]

On 2018/8/16 7:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/13/2018 04:24 AM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO has implemented the if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR, So
>> just replace them rather than duplicating its implement.
> Subject should be:
>
> phy: phy-brcm-usb: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO to replace open coded version
 Thank you for tips. It is my mistake.:-[

 Sincerely,
 zhong jiang
> Thank you
>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
>> index d1dab36..f59b1dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-brcm-usb.c
>> @@ -372,10 +372,8 @@ static int brcm_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	clk_disable(priv->usb_30_clk);
>>  
>>  	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, brcm_usb_phy_xlate);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider))
>> -		return PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
>>  
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>>  }
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>
>