public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	like.xu@intel.com, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
	arei.gonglei@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] KVM/x86: intel_pmu_lbr_enable
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:22:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C2DB81F.3000906@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALMp9eRPvxPCnAnWr8+U98PzZLQ8LzeBRMyPk0qROKBzSzSnRQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/03/2019 07:26 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 2:01 AM Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> wrote:
>> The lbr stack is architecturally specific, for example, SKX has 32 lbr
>> stack entries while HSW has 16 entries, so a HSW guest running on a SKX
>> machine may not get accurate perf results. Currently, we forbid the
>> guest lbr enabling when the guest and host see different lbr stack
>> entries.
> How do you handle live migration?

This feature is gated by the QEMU "lbr=true" option.
So if the lbr fails to work on the destination machine,
the destination side QEMU wouldn't be able to boot,
and migration will not happen.

Best,
Wei

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-03  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-26  9:25 [PATCH v4 00/10] Guest LBR Enabling Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] perf/x86: fix the variable type of the LBR MSRs Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] perf/x86: add a function to get the lbr stack Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] KVM/x86: KVM_CAP_X86_GUEST_LBR Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] KVM/x86: intel_pmu_lbr_enable Wei Wang
2019-01-02 16:33   ` Liang, Kan
2019-01-04  9:58     ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 15:57       ` Liang, Kan
2019-01-05 10:09         ` Wei Wang
2019-01-07 14:22           ` Liang, Kan
2019-01-08  6:13             ` Wei Wang
2019-01-08 14:08               ` Liang, Kan
2019-01-09  1:54                 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-02 23:26   ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-03  7:22     ` Wei Wang [this message]
2019-01-03 15:34       ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-03 17:18         ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-04 10:09         ` Wei Wang
2019-01-04 15:53           ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-05 10:15             ` Wang, Wei W
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] KVM/x86: expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to the guest Wei Wang
2019-01-02 23:40   ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-03  8:00     ` Wei Wang
2019-01-03 15:25       ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-07  9:15         ` Wei Wang
2019-01-07 18:05           ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-07 18:20             ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-07 18:48               ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-07 20:14                 ` Andi Kleen
2019-01-07 21:00                   ` Jim Mattson
2019-01-08  7:53                 ` Wei Wang
2019-01-08 17:19                   ` Jim Mattson
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] perf/x86: no counter allocation support Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] KVM/x86/vPMU: Add APIs to support host save/restore the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] perf/x86: save/restore LBR_SELECT on vCPU switching Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] perf/x86: function to check lbr user callstack mode Wei Wang
2018-12-26  9:25 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] KVM/x86/lbr: lazy save the guest lbr stack Wei Wang
2018-12-27 20:51   ` Andi Kleen
2018-12-28  3:47     ` Wei Wang
2018-12-28 19:10       ` Andi Kleen
2018-12-27 20:52   ` [PATCH v4 10/10] KVM/x86/lbr: lazy save the guest lbr stack II Andi Kleen
2018-12-29  4:25     ` Wang, Wei W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5C2DB81F.3000906@intel.com \
    --to=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox