From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<zhaohongjiang@huawei.com>, <hare@suse.com>,
<dan.j.williams@intel.com>, <jthumshirn@suse.de>, <hch@lst.de>,
<huangdaode@hisilicon.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
<xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, <tj@kernel.org>, <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>, Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] scsi: libsas: reset the negotiated_linkrate when phy is down
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:11:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5C524B3B.5030007@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b06f81e-9ede-014d-b678-1996044106e3@huawei.com>
On 2019/1/30 21:08, John Garry wrote:
> On 30/01/2019 08:24, Jason Yan wrote:
>> If the device is unplugged or disconnected, the negotiated_linkrate
>> still can be seen from the userspace by sysfs. This makes people
>> confused and leaks information of the device last used. So let's reset
>> the negotiated_linkrate after the phy is down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
>> CC: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>> CC: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
>> CC: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
>> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>> CC: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
>> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> CC: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 2 ++
>> include/scsi/libsas.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> index 17eb4185f29d..7b0e6dcef6e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
>> @@ -1904,6 +1904,8 @@ static void sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(struct
>> domain_device *parent,
>> &parent->port->sas_port_del_list);
>> phy->port = NULL;
>> }
>> + if (phy->phy)
>> + phy->phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN;
>
> Does this work for both PHYs which were either directly attached or just
> forming part of a wideport?
>
> Please also note that the expander PHY which was previously attached may
> also show the incorrect value.
Good catch, all PHYs need to do this, not only the last PHY of the wideport.
>
>> }
>>
>> static int sas_discover_bfs_by_root_level(struct domain_device *root,
>> diff --git a/include/scsi/libsas.h b/include/scsi/libsas.h
>> index 3de3b10da19a..420156cea3ee 100644
>> --- a/include/scsi/libsas.h
>> +++ b/include/scsi/libsas.h
>> @@ -448,6 +448,9 @@ static inline void sas_phy_disconnected(struct
>> asd_sas_phy *phy)
>> {
>> phy->oob_mode = OOB_NOT_CONNECTED;
>> phy->linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN;
>> +
>
> Then idea behind sas_phy_disconnected() was to set root PHY values only:
>
> /* Before calling a notify event, LLDD should use this function
> * when the link is severed (possibly from its tasklet).
> * The idea is that the Class only reads those, while the LLDD,
> * can R/W these (thus avoiding a race)
>
> libsas does set sas_phy negotiated_linkrate (but only for expander
> PHYs), so not the perfect place to set this. I'm nitpicking a bit here.
>
I don't want to put it here. I asked chenxiang to fix this in LLDD, but
he insist libsas to do this. Would you please discuss with chenxiang and
come to an agreement?
>
>> + if (phy->phy)
>> + phy->phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN;
>> }
>>
>> static inline unsigned int to_sas_gpio_od(int device, int bit)
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-31 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 8:24 [PATCH v2 0/7] libsas: fix issue of swapping or replacing disks Jason Yan
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] scsi: libsas: reset the negotiated_linkrate when phy is down Jason Yan
2019-01-30 13:08 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 1:11 ` Jason Yan [this message]
2019-01-31 9:00 ` John Garry
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] scsi: libsas: only clear phy->in_shutdown after shutdown event done Jason Yan
2019-01-30 16:26 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 1:13 ` Jason Yan
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] scsi: libsas: optimize the debug print of the revalidate process Jason Yan
2019-01-30 16:41 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 1:31 ` Jason Yan
2019-01-31 10:25 ` John Garry
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] scsi: libsas: split the replacement of sas disks in two steps Jason Yan
2019-01-30 17:22 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 2:04 ` Jason Yan
2019-01-31 10:29 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 16:38 ` John Garry
2019-02-01 1:58 ` Jason Yan
2019-02-01 9:34 ` John Garry
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] scsi: libsas: check if the same device when flutter Jason Yan
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] scsi: libsas: reset the phy address if discover failed Jason Yan
2019-01-30 17:36 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 2:13 ` Jason Yan
2019-01-31 9:10 ` John Garry
2019-01-30 8:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] scsi: libsas: fix issue of swapping two sas disks Jason Yan
2019-01-30 17:53 ` John Garry
2019-01-31 2:55 ` Jason Yan
2019-01-31 16:34 ` John Garry
2019-02-01 2:04 ` Jason Yan
2019-02-01 9:27 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5C524B3B.5030007@huawei.com \
--to=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=huangdaode@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=zhaohongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).