From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kinseyho@google.com, weixugc@google.com, ljs@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
dave@stgolabs.net, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, rkodsara@amd.com,
vkoul@kernel.org, bharata@amd.com, sj@kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, xuezhengchu@huawei.com, yiannis@zptcorp.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
peterx@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
stalexan@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, nifan.cxl@gmail.com,
jic23@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, nathan.lynch@amd.com,
Frank.li@nxp.com, djbw@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Day <michael.day@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] mm/migrate: add copy offload registration infrastructure
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 17:46:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a0ee441-3c0d-43b0-84f3-7e727ae042bd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260428155043.39251-12-shivankg@amd.com>
On 4/28/26 17:50, Shivank Garg wrote:
> Add a registration interface that lets a single offload provider
> (DMA, multi-threaded CPU copy, etc) take over the batch folio copy
> performed by migrate_pages_batch().
>
> The provider fills in a struct migrator with an offload_copy()
> callback and calls migrate_offload_register(). Registration patches
> the migrate_offload_copy() static_call and flips the
> migrate_offload_enabled static branch. The migrate_offload_unregister()
> reverts both.
>
> Whether a migration reason is batch-copy eligible is decided by the
> core in migrate_offload_do_batch(). A migrator may decline a particular
> batch (e.g. when nr_batch is too small to amortize setup) by returning
> -EOPNOTSUPP, and the move phase falls back to per-folio CPU copy.
>
> Only one migrator can be active at a time. A second registration
> returns -EBUSY, and only the active migrator can unregister itself.
> The static_call dispatch is protected by SRCU so that the
> synchronize_srcu() in unregister waits for all in-flight copy before
> the module reference is dropped.
>
> Co-developed-by: Mike Day <michael.day@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Day <michael.day@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
MAINTAINERS file deserves some love (likely put the new files under the
migration section)
> ---
> include/linux/migrate_copy_offload.h | 44 +++++++++++++
> mm/Kconfig | 6 ++
> mm/Makefile | 1 +
> mm/migrate.c | 57 +++++++++++++++--
> mm/migrate_copy_offload.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/migrate_copy_offload.h
> create mode 100644 mm/migrate_copy_offload.c
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate_copy_offload.h b/include/linux/migrate_copy_offload.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d68b10a84743
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate_copy_offload.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_MIGRATE_COPY_OFFLOAD_H
> +#define _LINUX_MIGRATE_COPY_OFFLOAD_H
> +
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/srcu.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct list_head;
> +struct module;
> +
> +#define MIGRATOR_NAME_LEN 32
> +
> +/**
> + * struct migrator - batch-copy provider for page migration.
> + * @name: name of the provider.
> + * @offload_copy: copy @folio_cnt folios from @src_list to @dst_list.
> + *
> + * The migrator may inspect @folio_cnt to decide whether the batch
> + * is worth offloading, e.g. skip when the batch is too small to
> + * amortize setup cost. If returns error, the core falls back to CPU copy.
> + *
> + * @owner: module providing the migrator.
> + */
> +struct migrator {
> + char name[MIGRATOR_NAME_LEN];
> + int (*offload_copy)(struct list_head *dst_list,
> + struct list_head *src_list,
> + unsigned int folio_cnt);
> + struct module *owner;
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION_COPY_OFFLOAD
> +extern struct static_key_false migrate_offload_enabled;
> +extern struct srcu_struct migrate_offload_srcu;
> +int migrate_offload_register(struct migrator *m);
> +int migrate_offload_unregister(struct migrator *m);
> +#else
> +static inline int migrate_offload_register(struct migrator *m) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> +static inline int migrate_offload_unregister(struct migrator *m) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; }
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_MIGRATE_COPY_OFFLOAD_H */
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index e8bf1e9e6ad9..325d79619680 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -647,6 +647,12 @@ config MIGRATION
> config DEVICE_MIGRATION
> def_bool MIGRATION && ZONE_DEVICE
>
> +# Page-migration batch-copy offload infrastructure.
> +# Selected by migrator drivers (e.g. CONFIG_DCBM_DMA).
> +config MIGRATION_COPY_OFFLOAD
> + bool
> + depends on MIGRATION
> +
> config ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION
> bool
>
> diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile
> index 8ad2ab08244e..db1ac8097089 100644
> --- a/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/mm/Makefile
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FAILSLAB) += failslab.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC) += fail_page_alloc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST) += memtest.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION) += migrate.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION_COPY_OFFLOAD) += migrate_copy_offload.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += memory-tiers.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEVICE_MIGRATION) += migrate_device.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) += huge_memory.o khugepaged.o
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 6c2f1cb66f96..9af070f9a1f2 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
> #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> #include <linux/pagewalk.h>
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call.h>
> +#include <linux/migrate_copy_offload.h>
>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>
> @@ -54,6 +56,51 @@
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(migrate_offload_enabled);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION_COPY_OFFLOAD
> +DEFINE_SRCU(migrate_offload_srcu);
> +DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(migrate_offload_copy, folios_mc_copy);
> +
> +static bool migrate_offload_do_batch(int reason)
> +{
> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&migrate_offload_enabled))
> + return false;
> +
> + switch (reason) {
> + case MR_COMPACTION:
> + case MR_SYSCALL:
> + case MR_DEMOTION:
> + case MR_NUMA_MISPLACED:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int migrate_offload_batch_copy(struct list_head *dst_batch,
> + struct list_head *src_batch,
> + unsigned int nr_batch)
> +{
> + int idx, rc;
> +
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&migrate_offload_srcu);
> + rc = static_call(migrate_offload_copy)(dst_batch, src_batch, nr_batch);
> + srcu_read_unlock(&migrate_offload_srcu, idx);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +#else
> +static bool migrate_offload_do_batch(int reason)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static int migrate_offload_batch_copy(struct list_head *dst_batch,
> + struct list_head *src_batch,
> + unsigned int nr_batch)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +#endif
Can't all that go to migrate_copy_offload.(hc) Looks like a clean interface form
migrate.c, no?
> +
> static const struct movable_operations *offline_movable_ops;
> static const struct movable_operations *zsmalloc_movable_ops;
>
> @@ -1833,7 +1880,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
> struct folio *folio, *folio2, *dst = NULL;
> int rc, rc_saved = 0, nr_pages;
> unsigned int nr_batch = 0;
> - bool batch_copied = false;
> + bool do_batch = false, batch_copied = false;
> LIST_HEAD(unmap_batch);
> LIST_HEAD(dst_batch);
> LIST_HEAD(unmap_single);
> @@ -1843,6 +1890,8 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(mode != MIGRATE_ASYNC &&
> !list_empty(from) && !list_is_singular(from));
>
> + do_batch = migrate_offload_do_batch(reason);
> +
> for (pass = 0; pass < nr_pass && retry; pass++) {
> retry = 0;
> thp_retry = 0;
> @@ -1984,8 +2033,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
> nr_retry_pages += nr_pages;
> break;
> case 0:
> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&migrate_offload_enabled) &&
> - folio_supports_batch_copy(folio)) {
> + if (do_batch && folio_supports_batch_copy(folio)) {
I was about to say, the migrate_offload_enabled usage in the previous patch
looks off.
Can you move that to this patch here, and use in the previous patch simply a
default migrate_offload_do_batch() that simply returns "false" ?
> list_move_tail(&folio->lru, &unmap_batch);
> list_add_tail(&dst->lru, &dst_batch);
> nr_batch++;
> @@ -2017,7 +2065,8 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
>
> /* Batch-copy eligible folios before the move phase */
> if (!list_empty(&unmap_batch)) {
> - rc = folios_mc_copy(&dst_batch, &unmap_batch, nr_batch);
> + rc = migrate_offload_batch_copy(&dst_batch, &unmap_batch,
> + nr_batch);
> batch_copied = (rc == 0);
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate_copy_offload.c b/mm/migrate_copy_offload.c
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260428155043.39251-2-shivankg@amd.com>
2026-05-07 9:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] Accelerate page migration with batch copying and hardware offload Huang, Ying
2026-05-11 15:19 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
[not found] ` <87zf2kvnqy.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA>
2026-05-08 11:04 ` Garg, Shivank
2026-05-08 11:28 ` Huang, Ying
2026-05-08 12:34 ` Garg, Shivank
2026-05-09 7:49 ` Huang, Ying
2026-05-10 15:03 ` Garg, Shivank
[not found] ` <20260428155043.39251-6-shivankg@amd.com>
2026-05-07 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/migrate: use migrate_info field instead of private Huang, Ying
2026-05-11 15:22 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
[not found] ` <20260428155043.39251-8-shivankg@amd.com>
2026-05-11 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/migrate: skip data copy for already-copied folios David Hildenbrand (Arm)
[not found] ` <20260428155043.39251-10-shivankg@amd.com>
2026-05-11 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/migrate: add batch-copy path in migrate_pages_batch David Hildenbrand (Arm)
[not found] ` <20260428155043.39251-12-shivankg@amd.com>
2026-05-11 15:46 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-05-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/migrate: add copy offload registration infrastructure David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-05-11 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/7] Accelerate page migration with batch copying and hardware offload David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a0ee441-3c0d-43b0-84f3-7e727ae042bd@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kinseyho@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.day@amd.com \
--cc=nathan.lynch@amd.com \
--cc=nifan.cxl@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rkodsara@amd.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=stalexan@redhat.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xuezhengchu@huawei.com \
--cc=yiannis@zptcorp.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox