From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<irogers@google.com>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<ak@linux.intel.com>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf/x86: Fix smp_processor_id()-in-preemptible warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:06:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a49e8fa-d7db-a380-174d-b44b34db62ae@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729220928.325449-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Hello Huafei,
On 7/30/2024 3:39 AM, Li Huafei wrote:
> The following bug was triggered on a system built with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y:
>
> # echo p > /proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/117
> caller is perf_event_print_debug+0x1a/0x4c0
> CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 117 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.11.0-rc1 #109
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x4f/0x60
> check_preemption_disabled+0xc8/0xd0
> perf_event_print_debug+0x1a/0x4c0
> __handle_sysrq+0x140/0x180
> write_sysrq_trigger+0x61/0x70
> proc_reg_write+0x4e/0x70
> vfs_write+0xd0/0x430
> ? handle_mm_fault+0xc8/0x240
> ksys_write+0x9c/0xd0
> do_syscall_64+0x96/0x190
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
>
> This is because the commit d4b294bf84db ("perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support
> for counters") took smp_processor_id() outside the irq critical section.
> If a preemption occurs in perf_event_print_debug() and the task is
> migrated to another cpu, we may get incorrect pmu debug information.
> Move smp_processor_id() back inside the irq critical section to fix this
> issue.>
> Fixes: d4b294bf84db ("perf/x86: Hybrid PMU support for counters")
> Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@huawei.com>
I can confirm seeing the splat on current tip:perf/core with
CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y and can also confirm I no longer see it with this
patch for the above mentioned reproducer.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
> ---
> v2:
> - "cpu" and "idx" are defined together.
> - Use guard(irqsave)() instead of local_irq_save{restore}() to avoid
> forgetting to restore irq when returning early.
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 12f2a0c14d33..2cadfdd8dd99 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -1521,19 +1521,22 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> {
> u64 ctrl, status, overflow, pmc_ctrl, pmc_count, prev_left, fixed;
> u64 pebs, debugctl;
> - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> - struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> - unsigned long *cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
> - unsigned long *fixed_cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask);
> - struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
> - unsigned long flags;
> - int idx;
> + int cpu, idx;
> + struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
> + unsigned long *cntr_mask, *fixed_cntr_mask;
> + struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;> +
> + guard(irqsave)();
> +
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> + cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
> + fixed_cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask);
> + pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
>
> if (!*(u64 *)cntr_mask)
> return;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> -
> if (x86_pmu.version >= 2) {> rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, ctrl);
> rdmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, status);
> @@ -1577,7 +1580,6 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("CPU#%d: fixed-PMC%d count: %016llx\n",
> cpu, idx, pmc_count);
> }
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
>
> void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 22:09 [PATCH v2] perf/x86: Fix smp_processor_id()-in-preemptible warnings Li Huafei
2024-07-29 14:25 ` Li Huafei
2024-07-29 15:10 ` Liang, Kan
2024-07-30 4:36 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2024-07-31 11:07 ` [tip: perf/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Li Huafei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a49e8fa-d7db-a380-174d-b44b34db62ae@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lihuafei1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox