From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] RDMA/srp: Fix use-after-free in srp_exit_cmd_priv
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:26:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a4a42fe-c5c8-63fe-365f-e6c74a279cc2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624225908.GA303931@nvidia.com>
On 6/24/22 15:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I don't even understand how get_device() prevents this call chain??
>
> It looks to me like the problem is srp_remove_one() is not waiting for
> or canceling some outstanding work.
Hi Jason,
My conclusions from the call traces in Li's email are as follows:
* scsi_host_dev_release() can get called after srp_remove_one().
* srp_exit_cmd_priv() uses the ib_device pointer. If srp_remove_one() is
called before srp_exit_cmd_priv() then a use-after-free is triggered.
Is calling get_device() and put_device() on the struct ib_device an
acceptable way to fix this? If so, I recommend to insert a get_device()
call after the scsi_add_host() call and put_device() calls after the two
scsi_remove_host() calls instead of merging the patch at the start of
this email thread.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-24 4:02 [RFC PATCH] RDMA/srp: Fix use-after-free in srp_exit_cmd_priv Li Zhijian
2022-06-24 22:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-24 23:26 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-06-24 23:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-24 23:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-27 6:47 ` lizhijian
2022-06-27 17:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-28 4:41 ` lizhijian
2022-06-28 21:56 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a4a42fe-c5c8-63fe-365f-e6c74a279cc2@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox