From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935098AbcIWIfE (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 04:35:04 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:54017 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932274AbcIWIfB (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 04:35:01 -0400 Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init() To: Dan Carpenter References: <20160922100257.GN13620@mwanda> <45c2ad6e-fadc-8d4a-f6bd-ddf8604ec622@users.sourceforge.net> <20160922202419.GP13620@mwanda> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Bhaktipriya Shridhar , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , =?UTF-8?Q?Noralf_Tr=c3=b8nnes?= , Tejun Heo , Thierry Reding , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <5a98e827-4ac1-ee6f-171b-02de97927a69@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:34:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160922202419.GP13620@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mRPP8/nH3MdExtxTOb0DLhc2QsfSaHlv56P2+9bErTkea/yVnIr 7t1SUDGCOYYX9GVRnAmlxMo6Aq4AHASd6XH3hoT0eBcCu7xucW+iVhqliqDw+ifj5nGyDAN o8Xnyi43CPxhg0eXvoLzKYArnFDcM79+QY2DmS4nJkQ2PDu5FiGPaGQUfSZbPZP/Sz+0wo0 KKMiq7A6YlJ5oQw256Olg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uumTN0SjFzs=:hew0NXTV1zMqk+7gzKYq0s AhDUTAUxVySALT3jBvO4seWcWZ0VSitGxOVMRNIYnnJUeXx25myyETG+ysnlxP4b1TGhTgzLw eS4UWRUHSO6IkQaL7B4dyL7XsoXy1qDY/cs/XyJNCMLgHgnFJli10PKWdGHY5POyHSybQWmsi IPCqNYAtsQ4ykj6IznJNJO5ZxdAXOrc42iqp6N+jfT+FoGrR1ETFzDwAcQ/HL8omiIs0/UWiu Vd32O6B46MzozpL+RTa2dMQIXUFJmZHbWN3Zo7W/Ob8PxH0mG91fqZeiKlDqgJoW3APIvBZjk XEvvMMJl0LvFCVUhJ1w8BZl5zt5H4kEllAdrCT7SK/7v28Pa37qlIXEf6PrvKVgEfWFg7n6rw 98VW1LCzqvxQmutsz5zGN73KSQRSxIOCyQHH9HRLqKbKV+BMIDWbyyTM6XnXJVRqhXCPef9kI DF2LT8yug+oFrmK1xJbpu+tEyUZKOnAE/eJM5xSe4YI0YxEZQRP+3e9kMH6sfv6dST8x/FMWw SvHzD2WOdc0auW7e64JnLHLHuBRdSS0s3VOQ7qwuw39XfsUrWDfk+VTAcisnR54f3QObfwdJ3 bKZVPofQ/Apy5vtqeogGEx6oE2guDZePEL6nq9cAsQLHWScFlVM0DpaYzxIqQu3FWhviMRPXr kJJHueym4WFYcaVYqONXJGL1sDK0aPWDyBiOeTep4Zk/HatqCt3MnDNewsm22rdJL0s5i7QUh VZRPrmeC2gB+PbOsYjEI9AbwxY7LWeMEzRPVoRs9kpn2OWptIvPPXowl/MW7laY3DpZDhZ/VM lxDmsmu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Would you like to discuss the statistics for my failure (or success) rate >> a bit more so that involved issues can be clarified in a constructive way? > > It should be that you target 20 bug fixes for each new regression > that you add. How do you think about to clarify any concrete "regression" a bit more? > There is no hope for improving the kernel I have got an other impression. - I am trying to help also for this goal. > because you are not even trying to fix 20 bugs, Under which circumstances would you dare to acknowledge once more that I improved anything for which you care about? > only introducing them. It's a pity that you interpret some of my contributions in this way. > Once you fix 20 bugs, then you will be even and you can start sending > cleanups again. This is fair. How much will the suggested software refactorings influence the kind of error counter that you prefer so far? Regards, Markus