Re: [PATCH 10/12] Documentation: x86: Enclose TDX initialization code inside code block

[Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On Sat, 2022-07-09 at 11:20 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> kernel test robot reported htmldocs warning on Documentation/x86/tdx.rst:
> 
> Documentation/x86/tdx.rst:69: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.
> Documentation/x86/tdx.rst:70: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> 
> These warnings above are due to missing code block marker before TDX
> initialization code, which confuses Sphinx as normal block quote instead.
> 
> Add literal code block marker to fix the warnings.

Thank you! will fix.

> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/202207042107.YqVvxdJz-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: f05f595045dfc7 ("Documentation/x86: Add documentation for TDX host support")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/x86/tdx.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/tdx.rst b/Documentation/x86/tdx.rst
> index 6c6b09ca6ba407..4430912a2e4f05 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/tdx.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/tdx.rst
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ use it as 'metadata' for the TDX memory.  It also takes additional CPU
>  time to initialize those metadata along with the TDX module itself.  Both
>  are not trivial.  Current kernel doesn't choose to always initialize the
>  TDX module during kernel boot, but provides a function tdx_init() to
> -allow the caller to initialize TDX when it truly wants to use TDX:
> +allow the caller to initialize TDX when it truly wants to use TDX::
>  
>          ret = tdx_init();
>          if (ret)