From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262163AbULCLwC (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:52:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262172AbULCLwC (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:52:02 -0500 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.197]:51726 "EHLO rproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262163AbULCLv7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:51:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=EGnvTq4u7R53Vo3jOSZn3qdJb+oEtt2S1un6T3MGpQhimcYG7GxbmNWb+r0Ydwa2cG/EwHPpry/r29a1hWqVfHqWUYYusLuC+ZGXE55sVmQqCijkhwNbsCDmTMeT72ORcbvU/YLjY0r4Qjtg8B4/t+VoF6a2P8KsDN3jQO+LTvI= Message-ID: <5b64f7f041203035133c53d10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 06:51:57 -0500 From: Rahul Karnik Reply-To: Rahul Karnik To: Jan Engelhardt Subject: Re: cdrecord dev=ATA cannont scanbus as non-root [u] Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1101763996l.13519l.0l@werewolf.able.es> <20041130071638.GC10450@suse.de> <1101935773.11949.86.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200412021723.48883.astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:35:32 +0100 (MET), Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > Ok, so I am a bit confused here. We basically have 3 ways to use > >> cdrecord on linux-2.6 without ide-scsi: > >> > >> 1) cdrecord dev=/dev/hdx > >> 2) cdrecord dev=ATA > >> 3) cdrecord dev=ATAPI > >> > >> Now, if I run all three and grep for '^Warning', I get: > > Worse, yet, there is no DMA for any of these three :-( Not true in 2.6. 1 definitely uses DMA now (disregard the damn warning). And why would anyone use 2 or 3? -Rahul