The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop redundant BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:56:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b69ff03-1694-bae6-3312-a63273be4073@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3tuxzl54BvG406t@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>

On 2022-11-21 12:27, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:00:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Hello Nathan,
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> On 11/20/22 21:46, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> Hi Anshuman,
> 
>>> I just bisected a boot failure in our QEMU-based continuous integration
>>> setup to this change as commit 9ed2b4616d4e ("arm64/mm: Drop redundant
>>> BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc)") in the arm64 tree. There is no output so the
>>> panic clearly happens early at boot. If I move back to the previous
>>> commit and add a WARN_ON() like so:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> index d386033a074c..9280a92ff920 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping_locked(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>>>   	phys &= PAGE_MASK;
>>>   	addr = virt & PAGE_MASK;
>>>   	end = PAGE_ALIGN(virt + size);
>>> +	WARN_ON(!pgtable_alloc);
>>>   
>>>   	do {
>>>   		next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>>
>>> I do see some stacktraces. I have attached the boot log from QEMU.
>>>
>>> If there is any additional information I can provide or patches I can
>>> test, I am more than happy to do so.
>>
>> There are couple of instances, where __create_pgd_mapping() function gets called
>> without a valid pgtable alloc function (NULL is passed on instead), as it is not
>> expected to allocate page table pages, during the mapping process. The following
>> change after this patch should solve the reported problem.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 9ea8e9039992..a00563122fcb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>   #define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS      BIT(0)
>>   #define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS       BIT(1)
>>   #define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS       BIT(2)  /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */
>> +#define NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS      BIT(3)  /* does not allocate page table pages */
>>   
>>   int idmap_t0sz __ro_after_init;
>>   
>> @@ -380,7 +381,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping_locked(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>>          phys &= PAGE_MASK;
>>          addr = virt & PAGE_MASK;
>>          end = PAGE_ALIGN(virt + size);
>> -       BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc);
>> +       BUG_ON(!(flags & NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS) && !pgtable_alloc);
>>   
>>          do {
>>                  next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> @@ -453,7 +454,7 @@ static void __init create_mapping_noalloc(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
>>                  return;
>>          }
>>          __create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot, NULL,
>> -                            NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
>> +                            NO_CONT_MAPPINGS | NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS);
>>   }
>>   
>>   void __init create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
>> @@ -481,7 +482,7 @@ static void update_mapping_prot(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
>>          }
>>   
>>          __create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot, NULL,
>> -                            NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
>> +                            NO_CONT_MAPPINGS | NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS);
>>   
>>          /* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
>>          flush_tlb_kernel_range(virt, virt + size);
> 
> This is now more complicated than what we had originally, and it doesn't catch
> the case where the caller sets NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS but the callee ends up needing
> to perform an allocation, which the old code would have caught.

Well, it's still "caught" as such - all that BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc) does 
in these cases is encode the source location in the backtrace, vs. 
having to decode it (if necessary) from the LR in a backtrace from 
immediately dereferencing pgtable_alloc(). If that happens before the 
user has a console up then the difference is moot anyway.

Cheers,
Robin.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18  5:31 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop redundant BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc) Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-18 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-18 19:40 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-20 16:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-21  5:30   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-21 12:27     ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-21 12:51       ` Will Deacon
2022-11-21 13:56       ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-11-22  3:13         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-22 14:12           ` Biju Das
2022-11-22 19:08           ` Robin Murphy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-21 15:47 Naresh Kamboju
2022-11-21 18:03 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b69ff03-1694-bae6-3312-a63273be4073@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox