From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop redundant BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:56:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b69ff03-1694-bae6-3312-a63273be4073@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3tuxzl54BvG406t@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
On 2022-11-21 12:27, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:00:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Hello Nathan,
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> On 11/20/22 21:46, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> Hi Anshuman,
>
>>> I just bisected a boot failure in our QEMU-based continuous integration
>>> setup to this change as commit 9ed2b4616d4e ("arm64/mm: Drop redundant
>>> BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc)") in the arm64 tree. There is no output so the
>>> panic clearly happens early at boot. If I move back to the previous
>>> commit and add a WARN_ON() like so:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> index d386033a074c..9280a92ff920 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping_locked(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>>> phys &= PAGE_MASK;
>>> addr = virt & PAGE_MASK;
>>> end = PAGE_ALIGN(virt + size);
>>> + WARN_ON(!pgtable_alloc);
>>>
>>> do {
>>> next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>>
>>> I do see some stacktraces. I have attached the boot log from QEMU.
>>>
>>> If there is any additional information I can provide or patches I can
>>> test, I am more than happy to do so.
>>
>> There are couple of instances, where __create_pgd_mapping() function gets called
>> without a valid pgtable alloc function (NULL is passed on instead), as it is not
>> expected to allocate page table pages, during the mapping process. The following
>> change after this patch should solve the reported problem.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> index 9ea8e9039992..a00563122fcb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0)
>> #define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1)
>> #define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(2) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */
>> +#define NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS BIT(3) /* does not allocate page table pages */
>>
>> int idmap_t0sz __ro_after_init;
>>
>> @@ -380,7 +381,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping_locked(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>> phys &= PAGE_MASK;
>> addr = virt & PAGE_MASK;
>> end = PAGE_ALIGN(virt + size);
>> - BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc);
>> + BUG_ON(!(flags & NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS) && !pgtable_alloc);
>>
>> do {
>> next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
>> @@ -453,7 +454,7 @@ static void __init create_mapping_noalloc(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
>> return;
>> }
>> __create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot, NULL,
>> - NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
>> + NO_CONT_MAPPINGS | NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS);
>> }
>>
>> void __init create_pgd_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm, phys_addr_t phys,
>> @@ -481,7 +482,7 @@ static void update_mapping_prot(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long virt,
>> }
>>
>> __create_pgd_mapping(init_mm.pgd, phys, virt, size, prot, NULL,
>> - NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
>> + NO_CONT_MAPPINGS | NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS);
>>
>> /* flush the TLBs after updating live kernel mappings */
>> flush_tlb_kernel_range(virt, virt + size);
>
> This is now more complicated than what we had originally, and it doesn't catch
> the case where the caller sets NO_ALLOC_MAPPINGS but the callee ends up needing
> to perform an allocation, which the old code would have caught.
Well, it's still "caught" as such - all that BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc) does
in these cases is encode the source location in the backtrace, vs.
having to decode it (if necessary) from the LR in a backtrace from
immediately dereferencing pgtable_alloc(). If that happens before the
user has a console up then the difference is moot anyway.
Cheers,
Robin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-18 5:31 [PATCH] arm64/mm: Drop redundant BUG_ON(!pgtable_alloc) Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-18 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-18 19:40 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-20 16:16 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-21 5:30 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-21 12:27 ` Mark Rutland
2022-11-21 12:51 ` Will Deacon
2022-11-21 13:56 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2022-11-22 3:13 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-11-22 14:12 ` Biju Das
2022-11-22 19:08 ` Robin Murphy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-21 15:47 Naresh Kamboju
2022-11-21 18:03 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5b69ff03-1694-bae6-3312-a63273be4073@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox