public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
	Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for muiltiple PLIC instances
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 09:14:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bc4010161af7bef8e3c30e08888ec82@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR04MB62078C2854FE33CE81186FA88DBA0@MN2PR04MB6207.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 2020-05-16 17:38, Anup Patel wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

[...]

>> I *have* given you a way to implement that in a better way. But again, 
>> I'd
>> rather you *don't* do it for the reason I have outlined above.
> 
> I explored kernel/irq/proc.c and we can achieve what this patch does
> by implementing irq_print_chip() callback of "struct irq_chip" so we
> certainly don't need separate "struct irq_chip" for each PLIC instance.
> 
> I will implement irq_print_chip() callback in v2 series.

You still haven't explained *why* you need to have this change.
As it stands, I'm not prepared to take it.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-18  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-16  6:38 [PATCH 0/4] More improvements for multiple PLICs Anup Patel
2020-05-16  6:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Setup cpuhp once after current handler is present Anup Patel
2020-05-16 12:11   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 12:52     ` Anup Patel
2020-05-16 13:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 16:28         ` Anup Patel
2020-05-17  8:02           ` Anup Patel
2020-05-16  6:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Improve boot prints for multiple PLIC instances Anup Patel
2020-05-16 12:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 12:53     ` Anup Patel
2020-05-16  6:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate irq_chip for muiltiple " Anup Patel
2020-05-16 12:29   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 13:01     ` Anup Patel
2020-05-16 13:16       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 16:38         ` Anup Patel
2020-05-18  8:14           ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-05-18  9:00             ` Anup Patel
2020-05-16  6:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Set default irq affinity in plic_irqdomain_map() Anup Patel
2020-05-16 12:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-16 12:53     ` Anup Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bc4010161af7bef8e3c30e08888ec82@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Alistair.Francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox